Bayern, City, Real did that this year
No, in those cases it's still not decided who secures the top spot in the end.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature currently requires accessing the site using the built-in Safari browser.
Bayern, City, Real did that this year
Poor OM so cruel group...
I hate this offside rule on the Napoli third goal, Hamsik strongly influences the defenders.
This is called justice. 2 years ago, Olympiacos destroyed Marseille inside Velodrome, but then Dortmund in the last fixture let the french comeback from 2-0 to 2-3 since Olympiacos was winning against Arsenal and deserved to go to the knockout stage. When you play unfair, you deserve to be punished in the future. I hope Dortmund is also left out, although probably this year Marseille will leave them win in France so that they repay their debt to their german friends. This whole thing has caused vommit to every healthy football fan.
I hope Napoli will not come in the same position as Olympiacos, clearly deserving to proceed but finally bowing out because of the shitty friendship of Marseille & Dortmund.
P.S. Last year Dortmund disgusted people when they scored the 3rd goal against Malaga, in a phase that included 2 offsides, yet 3 refs said it was ok since they had specific orders.
Great job Arsenal. The german cheaters were punished for what they did to Malaga last year, winning with disgusting referee help.
Just one chance from Arsenal, just one goal. Causing more pain to the rich germans, who thought the refs and Platini would always help them. If Dortmund beat Napoli, then Marseille will rescue them in the last fixture, since they will surely leave them win, just as Dortmund did 2 years ago when Olympiacos won against Arsenal but Marseille overturned 2-0 to 2-3 in the last 5 minutes in Germany, a result clearly fixed, just as Zagreb 1-7 Lyon (it was on the same day).
I hope Napoli will be strong and will not lose against Dortmund+refs and so Dortmund will be disqualified.
Like i've said countless times: i have nothing against those sugar daddies teams, in my discussions with people like beachryan (nothing wrong about him) i'm even the first to defend them. I know were they come from, they used to victims of unfair competition too and they took the easy way out.
But football should not be about billionaires and clubs trying to buy the 11 best players in the world. Football should be about patiently building teams, cautiously bringing youth talent in the first team. Silverware should be won by clubs doing it the right way.
With all due respect, i also think your comment shows a distinct lack of respect for all these clubs who are doing it the right way, who don't overspend and who are not in deficit.
I wonder how you would feel about this the day when Roman has had it with Chelsea... at that moment teams like Anderlecht, Ajax, Copenhagen, Porto and Benfica will still play CL matches. Are you sure Chelsea will even be in the EPL then ?
When Abramovich dies or when he has enough of Chelsea, the club will totally collapse. I wonder how you will feel then...
It is ouraging that clubs can buy good players like Willian and scarcely use them...football fans have the right to see these players perform week in week out and not only in league cup...
Yes but the poor refereeing advantaged both teams...
And just as you i don't believe in all these conspiracy theories.
Is it just "poor refereeing"?
It is a fact that referres are only human like you and me, and thus susceptible to influences. Most people here watch Dortmund on television and are impressed by the wall in that one fantastic stand. Is it any wonder that referees are influenced too ?
This should not happen ? Of course not, but it happens all the time.
It happens all the time: the team with the lesser reputation is slightly disadvantaged when there is doubt. What happened in Dortmund was more obvious, but that refe just had a bad day...talking about conspiracies is silly.
It happens to EVERY team. Sometimes they are bad referee mistakes, sometimes we just overreact to some decisions. If my team really has to win, then a single bad decision would not affect them (take for example the match with Benfica at Da Luz. Yes, the corner that was given should not, but after conceding so many corner goals in the previous games, I would expect us to be able and defend corners properly. If we did, we would win.).P.S. Panos, so you think I talk bullshit. No conspiracy. What happened to Olympiacos last year with Levante? 2 non-existant penalties and a false red card in the first 10 minutes. Were you happy when you saw the ref do those unbelievable things? When something happens so many times, it is not a coincidence. Olympiacos has found refs on his way too many times (Lyon, Monaco, Bordeaux, Real Madrid, Dortmund, Levante, Metalist, Maccabi, Lazio). When someone takes something that belongs to you, you HAVE to shout. Not keep silent and say thanks. Did you vote yes to the mnemonium?
Chelsea wouldn't become Pompey or Leeds if Roman left. They've grown too much and are past that point. The squad may need to be trimmed a little, ie. a player like Willian would probably need to be sold and replaced with a player of lesser quality, but they'd still compete at the top.
It's possible that they wouldn't implode immediately, but are you sure they would stay a big club, the way the game and the financial aspect evolues ?
Imagine Blackburn with Jack Walker, the amount of money they spend to become champion is now good enough to avoid relegation...
panathinaikos is the only team in Europe that played a friendly match with the Nazi army, in the wwii period.
Just please ignore him and feel sad about his bad mental condition.
I also watched Dortmund - Napoli.
Very good match. Mkytharian (hope that is correct) is such a wonderfull player.
Dortmund were the better team, but i quite enjoyed watching Napoli too.
Not too many refs would have given that penalty (i would, but it would result and 8 penalties in every match, i understand Napoli's outrage but don't agree with it).