TikTikTikTikTik
*****
- 7 August 2004
- Liverpool
Re: Liverpool Thread(I Just Can't Get Enough!!)
The annoyance with both Chelsea and especially City is that they are being rewarded for.......well f$%k all really. Chelsea less so as it was CL qualification that sealed them being bought instead of Liverpool, so they had some succes and were rewarded for it (even if it was out of proportion to their succes).
A lot of the hate for Chelsea was that they also became a horribly cynical team with Mourinho leading the cheating. They spent 250mil in two seasons and still they needed to dive and whinge (and even if they didn't they would still do it). Who can appreciate that?
As for City, who knows why they were bought? Because they are next to Utd? Atm I don't have a lot of problems with City, but that's mostly because they haven't yet achieved anything and I expect them to be hampered by the FFP rules. If they go currupt and use any means possible to continue to spend like madmen (cough stadium deal cough) I will really "hate" them. The fact they alse played some of the most boring football the last two seasons doesn't help them either.
There has to be a balance, both Chelsea and City are like 100m sprinters who are injecting themselves during the race. That's how blatant their financial doping is. Utd can spend huge amounts because they were smart and marketed themselves well whilst being succesfull. Liverpool less so, but they had a succesfull history and fanbase to lean on. And even then, neither clubs go way beyond their financial limits. They can spend that amount because they have earned it.
The annoyance with both Chelsea and especially City is that they are being rewarded for.......well f$%k all really. Chelsea less so as it was CL qualification that sealed them being bought instead of Liverpool, so they had some succes and were rewarded for it (even if it was out of proportion to their succes).
A lot of the hate for Chelsea was that they also became a horribly cynical team with Mourinho leading the cheating. They spent 250mil in two seasons and still they needed to dive and whinge (and even if they didn't they would still do it). Who can appreciate that?
As for City, who knows why they were bought? Because they are next to Utd? Atm I don't have a lot of problems with City, but that's mostly because they haven't yet achieved anything and I expect them to be hampered by the FFP rules. If they go currupt and use any means possible to continue to spend like madmen (cough stadium deal cough) I will really "hate" them. The fact they alse played some of the most boring football the last two seasons doesn't help them either.
There has to be a balance, both Chelsea and City are like 100m sprinters who are injecting themselves during the race. That's how blatant their financial doping is. Utd can spend huge amounts because they were smart and marketed themselves well whilst being succesfull. Liverpool less so, but they had a succesfull history and fanbase to lean on. And even then, neither clubs go way beyond their financial limits. They can spend that amount because they have earned it.