Lol.
There is something seriously wrong with your moral standards. Humour is a disgrace, but as long as there no teeth marks it's ok to bite. Fantastic.
Right i need to put you in your place and your overly simplistic view on the world.
Right first off, i didnt say Luis Suarez should not be punished. He tried to bite someone on the field of play.
Ok you got that, or do you want me to put it in capitals, or maybe send you a letter in the post confirming it? Good.
Secondly, the fact is he didnt actually BITE anyone in this instance (notice i say bite, not attempted bite), as both the police and the chelsea club doctors checked out Ivanovic and found nothing, thats why police charges, that could have been pressed, were dropped.
So is that clear? I'm not defending Suarez, he deserved a ban. The criticism comes from the lack of FA consistency regarding incidents and incidents of similar ilk (Defoe, Terry).
Ok thirdly, you may brush off what i said in the last post, but the fact remains that last nights PFA that was supported by Clarke Carlise, Gordon Taylor and Jason Roberts, all of whom campaigned against Surez when the Evra/Saurez incident happened, championing their moral outrage for months on end, where then engaging in laughing at a black comedian making jokes about Saurez and using the n word several times.
So theres something utterly wrong there? If the N word is not acceptable in this country why is it acceptable there? that was what everyone was told last year. Double standards and hypocrisy abounds as usual.
So is that clear? Theres nothing wrong with my moral compass. I just dont start foaming at the mouth as soon as something happens, and as ive continually said, there are those that come in here, supporting clubs that have had players of their own doing detestable things, whether you like it or not, but at the same time trying to take some moral high ground with Suarez.