I really think we expect way too much. We want this super realistic Sim-Game where everything looks and feels like it looks and feels in real life. But how many goals are scored in 2 x 5 mins playtime in real life? How many shots on goal in 2 x 10 mins playtime?
You cant have it all. It is a game at the end. If it would work like it works in real life, all games would end 0-0 without anything happen. We have to remember this before we judge this game too hart.
All we really need is a good balanced game. A Game that feels good, like PES 5 or maybe PES 6. Both games were not perfect with a lot of unrealistic situations but they feel good. Passing, shoting, crossing just feels good. The AI was ok (never perfect and way behind todays AI) and the game was fun overall. And that was ok for the most of us.
Today we never get satisfied. Never. I find myself looking for unrealistic scenes in every gameplay video at first. Uhh, that pass doesn't look good. Oh, have you seen this stupid defender? Oh dear, what a shit cross that was, he even used the wrong foot!
To be honest that is a bit stupid. It is a game and it is designed to have fun with it. It is designed for 5, 10 maybe 15 mins of playtime not for 90 mins. That makes a huge difference.
Im sure if EA would make my own FIFA Game no one would play it, because it would be damn boring. That is because i dont want a game actually i want to feel the reel thing. And that is not possible.
Not true. Fact is, relative to where we should be at this point in football games, we're not where we should be.
I'm quite satisfied with MLB '10. It is one of the closest simulations of sport I have ever seen, with sliders to control nearly every aspect of the game. NBA 2k as well, which looks to have made great strides this year, has incredible individuality with 'signature styles' and again sliders for nearly every aspect of the game. The point is it's quite possible to be satisfied with a sports game in this day and age, to say otherwise is making excuses.
To a degree, coming from being a Pro Evo fan, I'm more frustrated with what FIFA hasn't been able to do because it's not about tech. It's about lack of football knowledge. You see how much potential there is there to do GREAT things, but they never reach it because of this (and the fear of alienating the 'casual gamer'). They're like a player with all the potential in the world that never quite reaches the heights all the prognosticators predicted, and only makes you more disappointed. Pro-Evo clearly have had not nearly the amount of resources EA have, and while I don't give them a complete pass for the last two years, I can't kill them for it.
The fact is that if FIFA made the commitment to full sim, they would not lose customers. This is in full evidence with MLB and NBA 2K. These games make no bones about it, they are going for a full sim and it does not hurt their sales. EA should take a page from their playbook.
I am really looking forward to the Pro Evo demo next week and I have a funny feeling it might convert me back this year, but we will see...
EDIT: And how hard is it to make passes with a wrong foot inaccurate? I've seen a couple of posts about this and how it doesnt really matter, but it is essential to football and effects the whole balance of your team. Especially for example if you're trying to build a team in CM, you have a couple of very good right footed midfielders, but hey, it doesn't matter, I'll just put one of them on the left and everything will be fine. Takes out a whole layer of strategy.. and given that Pro evo was able to get this right 10 years ago, it shouldn't be that hard...