Please, try me. Chances are you find me much more reasonable and open for convincing then you seem to be suggesting, and
@Negatrev for that matter.
For example, yesterday i had a clear foul by the CPU not called:
And another clean tackle by CPU seen as a foul (no card).
If these more questionable decisions happen only very very occasionaly, i have no problem with them and thats where i am now. When i feel it happens every other match i would not hesitate to call the thing broken.
But wait, there's a catch. I took a second look at the first one and there is actually no contact:
So, right decision afterall. Its just that awkward stumble animation which is out of context that is the real 'bug' here, not the referee system.
Also, when you play the second vid on 0.5 speed you will notice how Dzeko's leg is touched first, denying him a chance to shield the ball from the incoming tackle. Thus, again, very much within reason to call it a foul.
I have absolutely no agenda to talk a banana straight but for me personally the collision and referee/collision system does a pretty decent job, not perfect, but far from broken.
You are making me think though, maybe i have actually become a bit too forgiving for things that could be improved. My natural instinct is to trust and learn the game mechanics and then work with them. As soon as i have a feel for what goes and what doesnt, i accept these rules because they do not obstruct me anymore and everything start to feel right for me, making it more difficult to be critical?