Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature currently requires accessing the site using the built-in Safari browser.
How it was with demo tweaker in last years when we had PES Demo on PC? What was the way to change the match time? I know that on FIFA we have cl.ini textual fine we need to edit and change the time value, but I can't remember tweaking Pro Evo demo. And no, I'm not wriitng about Jenkey's way of demo tweaking Everyone knows how it ended up.
Headers maybe.What in the... w-wait, is that U-Umtiti?! W...
Read somewhere that its going to be released around 1900 CET. Absolutely absurd this steam. I have a ps4 but i'd rather save my data and play it on pc, especially when online's free.Anyone know what is going on with the pc demo release? It would be very Konami to backtrack on the demo release at this point.
Hard to tell since Demos on PC were only released AFTER the full game was already out. So no one really bothered getting a demo or unlocking it or making time extenders or whatever.
Lots of talk now about people "expecting too much" and "it's only a game". It is only a game - and this is a site dedicated to it. Should we just delete the internet and agree never to criticise a game ever again because after all, they're just games? (Rhetorical question and yet I fear a few would say "yes"...)
As for "expecting too much"... What? Nobody's saying "a supercomputer should generate the AI and then we all access it via the cloud". What I'm seeing is "PA1 is too assisted" (turn down AI assistance), "the AI ruins the game by playing instant first-touch passes a lot" (slow decision-making down a tad)... Not "make real life on a disc".
However... I think the bigger point is that - as I've been saying for a while - Konami have chosen their direction, and it's as valid as any. A match is only 10 mins long or so, and you can only recreate so much - their vision is to create as many "highlights" as possible, in my opinion (meaning passes simply have to be super-accurate to create chances). I'm not a huge fan of the alternative either, to be honest (in the other game, I feel like a lot of chances are created just because defending is unnecessarily complicated and occasionally impossible).
There is no "right" and "wrong". When you're compressing 90 minutes into 10 minutes, you just can't make everything hyper-realistic or 90% of your matches would be 0-0. Whether you like one approach or another is simply preference.
Out of interest...
Do we think there's a split between people who want that classic PES gameplay (which this demo delivers to a degree, and I totally understand why people love it) - and people who are maybe hoping the gameplay would have evolved into something more "serious", more "simulatory" at this point in time?
Some of you guys seem to have some ridiculously high standards? Don't get me wrong though, by no means I'm saying this game is perfect. Nonetheless I'm absolutely loving the demo and I'm not that bothered by some of the annoyances some of you seem to have.
That's what I'm saying. The last PES demo we had (proper demo that was released before the full game was ready to play) was in 2013, I believe. I can't remember how long it took to have a tweaker released. I hope it won't take long in case of Pro 19 demo
I wonder whether KONAMI have found a solution against braking into game files to stop anyone from unlocking database content (teams) in the demo. Hopefully nobody gonna play with it again as it was the main reason why we didn't have demo on PC year after year since 2013.
Back to sliders.....everyone wins
This is one of those things where I'll usually end up tweaking it myself for each keeper (as I play them in Master League etc.). It's an annoying one to have to change but the whole 'defensive goalkeeper' player style that Konami assign to most keepers means they just sit on their line no matter what. If you replicate Neuer's attributes for player style and com-style then the keepers come off their line a lot more.Christ the non engaging goalkeeper is doing my head in
Well, this here is actually misinformation,fake news. There is actually a huge difference between controlling Messi and a Colo Colo player. Anyone saying otherwise is only pushing their attitude to complain no matter what.Getting penalties or the feeling of a slight difference in controlling Messi or a substitute from Colo-Colo is really a "high standard" in your eyes?
Could be the case.That's a shame, I have the same issue with all the camera angles being too zoomed in. If you want it zoomed out more you need a magnifying glass to play with Blimp cam. This kind of stuff in addition to the useless replay camera angles is unacceptable, they aren't evolving the game in these areas at all. What are all those extra developers they hired doing? It's so frustrating.
Or it could be that some people have ridiculously low standards? I just want something on par with the older PES games.
Out of interest...
Do we think there's a split between people who want that classic PES gameplay (which this demo delivers to a degree, and I totally understand why people love it) - and people who are maybe hoping the gameplay would have evolved into something more "serious", more "simulatory" at this point in time?
Lots of talk now about people "expecting too much" and "it's only a game". It is only a game - and this is a site dedicated to it. Should we just delete the internet and agree never to criticise a game ever again because after all, they're just games? (Rhetorical question and yet I fear a few would say "yes"...)
Christ the non engaging goalkeeper is doing my head in
Yep. And a lot of us are too old to go "play outside" now. Did all that back in the 70s and 80s with jumpers on the ground and in the pouring rain on a muddy field. That's why many of us enjoy footie games. Sad, but true.It really gets on my nerves when people say stuff like "it's just a game" or "if you want realistic football go play outside". Those are overstatements. We know that. That doesn't mean we can't ask or expect something better. Something more.
When people say that, it brings out the worst in me.
OH and YES... to your last question. There's definitely a split there.
A Time Extender wouldn't cause any troubles. I doubt Konami would punish PC players again next year just because of that.
Anyways... I think we'll have to wait 4-5 hours more until Demo hits Steam.
Definitely. I remember I created a poll last year about Sliders, and to this day I still can't believe how some people resist them. Like Sliders were going to damage them. It just speaks about how selfish some can be.
It really gets on my nerves when people say stuff like "it's just a game" or "if you want realistic football go play outside". Those are overstatements. We know that. That doesn't mean we can't ask or expect something better. Something more.
When people say that, it brings out the worst in me.
OH and YES... to your last question. There's definitely a split there.
Lots of talk now about people "expecting too much" and "it's only a game". It is only a game - and this is a site dedicated to it. Should we just delete the internet and agree never to criticise a game ever again because after all, they're just games? (Rhetorical question and yet I fear a few would say "yes"...)
As for "expecting too much"... What? Nobody's saying "a supercomputer should generate the AI and then we all access it via the cloud". What I'm seeing is "PA1 is too assisted" (turn down AI assistance), "the AI ruins the game by playing instant first-touch passes a lot" (slow decision-making down a tad)... Not "make real life on a disc".
However... I think the bigger point is that - as I've been saying for a while - Konami have chosen their direction, and it's as valid as any. A match is only 10 mins long or so, and you can only recreate so much - their vision is to create as many "highlights" as possible, in my opinion (meaning passes simply have to be super-accurate to create chances). I'm not a huge fan of the alternative either, to be honest (in the other game, I feel like a lot of chances are created just because defending is unnecessarily complicated and occasionally impossible).
There is no "right" and "wrong". When you're compressing 90 minutes into 10 minutes, you just can't make everything hyper-realistic or 90% of your matches would be 0-0. Whether you like one approach or another is simply preference.
Out of interest...
Do we think there's a split between people who want that classic PES gameplay (which this demo delivers to a degree, and I totally understand why people love it) - and people who are maybe hoping the gameplay would have evolved into something more "serious", more "simulatory" at this point in time?
online in a nutshell
OK Chuny, instead of saying people are selfish,lets say everyone is 100% behind sliders and they want them,and there is a demand for them in game.
Now what?
Yep. And a lot of us are too old to go "play outside" now. Did all that back in the 70s and 80s with jumpers on the ground and in the pouring rain on a muddy field. That's why many of us enjoy footie games. Sad, but true.
If the demand was that high, how could they overlook the need to implement it for the next version?.
And even if they didn't do it, at least we would have a stronger voice.
When I sent the EVO-WEB link to the poll I created last year to Adam, you know what he said?. He told me that 100 votes weren't enough, he thought Evo-Web was louder "these days". And about 20% disagreed about Sliders.
So that's it. That tiny 20% was enough for him to take it and hold on to it and say "not everybody want sliders".
Applied some custom tactic for both team. Since its a rival match, I want to make the ai as aggressive as possible. Increased def line, front line pressure, more compact shape.