chrissimao
4th Place Champions
Its history and its pointless derailing the thread bringing all that up again,sorry.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature currently requires accessing the site using the built-in Safari browser.
Its history and its pointless derailing the thread bringing all that up again,sorry.
Do u guys think we could play the demo with share play on ps4?
Really liked the trailer. It's still too fast for me, but i guess that is adjustable.
PESEdit wrote a pretty negative review of the PES 2016 Gamescom demo: http://www.peseditblog.com/2015/08/pes-2016-gamescom-preview.html
yes its right he said in the final version don´t need to choose rainy, it´s a dynamic thing, it will rain if it rains, and its a regional thing for example the Corinthians Arena have more rain probability than Santos Arena, in Sao Paulo rain more than Santos,the same thing the Old Trafford have much more rain probability than Arena Corinthians and then changes every thing, ball physics, the turf is much havier, you will see balls stuck in watter puddles,he adds that the turf turns slippy ,finishing he adds that what he likes more in pes2016 is the realism of the rainy weather.
that new crossing animation by alaba in the trailer is really nice, they could use a similar animation for the set pieces and finishing i think, neymars penalty really turned me off, looks like he is not even trying to score, if there is one thing where they try copy fifa i hope it's the penalties
.. I just spent half an hour watching youtube clips of "pes 16 compilation videos" from gamescom on my big 65" plasma smart tv, and I have to say this game actually looks amazing... which for me is as important as how it plays. How it plays?? well we'll soon find out with the demo, but if most of the review's are right saying its better than pes15 than im gonna be happy, since I was a fan.
In comparison (and i don't wanna start a pes v fifa war), I looked at many fifa 16 vids, and it looks horrible. The player models so long and ridiculous looking - so even if it plays well, I just cannot get into something that doesn't look realistic animation wise. I remember getting into fifa12 for a while, since pes12 was absolute rubbish, and didn't remember fifa 12 players looking as bad as 15 and 16... yeah of course pes 15/16 has its problems also: running animations, namely high speed sprinting, awkward running style with too much hip bend - lean fwd too much, and players with extensive wide arm flapping... But overall it still looks pretty good.
Anyways, my point being, of the weeks worth of gameplay footage we've had so far, in my opinion Pes2016 is by far the best, most realistic looking footy game to date...AND THE SMOOTHEST, which is an incredibly important thing for a momentum based sport such as football.... now hanging to feel the gameplay first hand...
I have a question from manual players
do you think more auto = more easy ?
of course playing on 2 bar pass assisted is easier than 0 bar, but how about between 2 bar and 4 bar ? (talk about 2015)
I think playing at 4 bar is more difficult than 2 bar assistance! because you are locked !! especially in through pass it make you lose the ball usually ... (going too forward)
in 2015 I decrease that from default (3) to 2, not for more challenging ! but for more easiness !
less than 2 is for challenging, ok ...
but am I the only one that think middle assisted is easiest?
Yeah, penalties in FIFA are great.
I have the suspect that someone from EA is (or was) reading Evo-Web back then... As in 2009 I posted something very similar to what penalties in FIFA would then be.
I'm still proud of that idea.
Sorry, but your post is full of Ad Hominem attacks. They stopped modding 15 months ago, so why would they even care about that? The part in the review about cheating is spot on.
Penalties on FIFA are perfect.
with my experience of pes15, I reckon full manual is definitely more challenging (but more realistic) with human v human... particularly when it comes to shooting..
Against the computer.. I play vs. Top player level... and I reckon the computer ai is harder when I try playing with some assistance as compared to full manual. When I play full manual, the ai isn't quite as sharp. Still, without a doubt full manual is much more realistic in every sense of the game, particularly passing accuracy and shooting.. far more variation and mistakes.. which is the norm in real soccer. Only real issue is that long range shooting is way overpowered, and this power should only be possessed by the power shooters and only when you have a lot of space to shoot. I haven't tried superstar with full manual, only because ive heard from a number of sources that the AI is unrealistically good... and that the game plays more varied and realistically on top player... Im enjoying top player so I haven't deviated from that yet..
In terms of advantages, once you do get better at manual, I do think you can definitely operate better through balls... which is the real advantage, particularly on the counter where you can get the ball in behind in better positions than what full auto would allow...
Like I said daz its a popular system so more preference and maybe a personal hankering I had for something I feel was done better by konami themselves many moons ago..
You remember how difficult Pate was to get along with so i really couldn't care less about what they put out. The arrogant people who couldn't care less about us and the community. Its was their patch or nothing.
Like Super Leeds said, its in the past now.
Cheating happens in every football and will continue to do so sadly.
Since it's a game, you can't stop "cheating" aka difficulty modifiers. Back then, there use to be "cheating" present but not as much as it is now because back then, it would make the A.I smarter and have a little bit of handicapness but now, it's only handicapness.