Re: PES 2013 Discussion Thread .......
Zero-assisted would be better if players actually reacted to passes in the same they did when assisted was on. Truth is they don't and it's not even really your fault. Your pass can be the same pass (let's say the same accuracy and power) but the assisted pass will for the most part always end with your player reacting a bit quicker to the ball because the game instantly knows who you're trying to pass to, even with 1 bar, and the recipient of the intended pass acts quicker rather than the game having to work it out who you're trying to pass to and react at a random point. I really don't get how people are 'playing the correct way' with zero-assisted passing on at all. They're challenging themselves to play a different way and that is fine but you cannot make out that it is the only real way to play the game. I've no issue if you're mad at how easy Konami have made passing on 4 bars of assisted as default because it really is stupid. Going the complete other way and feeling a sense of superiority is a bit silly though. I still stand by my point that the game functions much more cohesively as an assisted game.
Online play should be evened up, which is the context of the zero-assisted debate. It's a completely poor show from Konami to give you so many options for the style of play and then not force both you and your opponent to use the same options. If they're interested in balance then it's a complete necessity.
Zero-assisted would be better if players actually reacted to passes in the same they did when assisted was on. Truth is they don't and it's not even really your fault. Your pass can be the same pass (let's say the same accuracy and power) but the assisted pass will for the most part always end with your player reacting a bit quicker to the ball because the game instantly knows who you're trying to pass to, even with 1 bar, and the recipient of the intended pass acts quicker rather than the game having to work it out who you're trying to pass to and react at a random point. I really don't get how people are 'playing the correct way' with zero-assisted passing on at all. They're challenging themselves to play a different way and that is fine but you cannot make out that it is the only real way to play the game. I've no issue if you're mad at how easy Konami have made passing on 4 bars of assisted as default because it really is stupid. Going the complete other way and feeling a sense of superiority is a bit silly though. I still stand by my point that the game functions much more cohesively as an assisted game.
Online play should be evened up, which is the context of the zero-assisted debate. It's a completely poor show from Konami to give you so many options for the style of play and then not force both you and your opponent to use the same options. If they're interested in balance then it's a complete necessity.
Last edited: