pjft
Public Service Optimism
- 23 June 2003
Re: PES 2009 News, Discussion and Rumours
Actually, off to take a break from it :roll:
True, and I'm not arguing that. But it's the same level of professionalism that I would expect from a preview who completely discards the relevance of the new mode in PES2009, the "Become a Legend" one, saying that it is a lighter version of "Be a Pro" (even though we know that "Be a Pro" is 4 seasons long only, and that, from what Konami has been doing with Fantasista, it shouldn't be considered "light" at all), and that it's a frustration because you can't request for the ball and depend on the AI to pass you the ball, when this is contradictory with all that we know from previous versions of the mode, as well as what PSM3 Uk now confirmed, alongside some previous playtest impressions.
What I'm saying is that a reviewer is pretty much objective through his own lenses to the world. For instance, if he values the older gameplay of PES, he's bound to be happy with PES2009, no matter licenses and game modes. On the other extreme of the scale, there are those who value licenses and huge strides forward, and they are legitimately bound to bash PES completely. And then there's everyone in between who tend to tip one side or the other of the scale.
Well, I'm not adding much new, nor arguing what you're saying.
I was just trying to make a point that the fact that a magazine is enthusiastic about a game doesn't mean that it's not credible, nor are the only credible ones the ones who bash the game.
That's just extremist, but sadly it was a trend that was beginning to come up in this thread.
Best regards,
Paulo Tavares
![]()
Off to practise your pedantry?
Actually, off to take a break from it :roll:
TikTikTikTikTik said:The difference being a level of professionality and objectivity is required to be a professional reviewer. I seem to remember quite a few of the positive reviews disregarding important negative elements just to give the game a positive slant. Comment like "And now Konami have added the licenses of Newcaslte and Spurs". Ofcourse they disregarded that fact that Chelsea and Arsenal were removed.
True, and I'm not arguing that. But it's the same level of professionalism that I would expect from a preview who completely discards the relevance of the new mode in PES2009, the "Become a Legend" one, saying that it is a lighter version of "Be a Pro" (even though we know that "Be a Pro" is 4 seasons long only, and that, from what Konami has been doing with Fantasista, it shouldn't be considered "light" at all), and that it's a frustration because you can't request for the ball and depend on the AI to pass you the ball, when this is contradictory with all that we know from previous versions of the mode, as well as what PSM3 Uk now confirmed, alongside some previous playtest impressions.
What I'm saying is that a reviewer is pretty much objective through his own lenses to the world. For instance, if he values the older gameplay of PES, he's bound to be happy with PES2009, no matter licenses and game modes. On the other extreme of the scale, there are those who value licenses and huge strides forward, and they are legitimately bound to bash PES completely. And then there's everyone in between who tend to tip one side or the other of the scale.
Well, I'm not adding much new, nor arguing what you're saying.
I was just trying to make a point that the fact that a magazine is enthusiastic about a game doesn't mean that it's not credible, nor are the only credible ones the ones who bash the game.
That's just extremist, but sadly it was a trend that was beginning to come up in this thread.
Best regards,
Paulo Tavares