Man, finally braved up to watching that challenge again...ouch.
I know us English teams always believe officials in Europe punish us a bit unfairly, but comparing that 'challenge' with the red that ended SAF's final push against Madrid...you do wonder what these refs are smoking.
To be fair to the ref, he spent the remaining 80 minutes of the match looking like a war vet with PTSD, so he was clearly shaken up by it. But then you just wonder, if he couldn't see it was a reckless challenge, fine, but what was the guy behind the net looking at? Some ladies in the crowd?
FIFA/UEFA need to be clear. They claim to be changing the rules to protect players, but then this leg breaker is deemed fine by presumably at least 3 of their best officials.
I don't really mind as I'm old, but they can't have it both ways. 15/20 years ago no one would have batted an eye about that challenge, because he did indeed play the ball. But the rules apparently have changed to reflect the increased pace and danger of the sport whereby playing the ball isn't the rule, it's being reckless and endangering other players by being out of control. So which is it?
One thing is for sure, the 'expert pundits' have no idea. It's either a 'good full last-ditch tackle', a 'full-blooded challenge', 'he got a touch on the ball' or 'the kind of challenge [defender x who is a pundit] would be proud of'.
Anyway, I find Moreno's apology a big meh. Here's a player who's just come back from a broken leg apologising and saying he knows what it's like. Well maybe play fairly and don't go launching yourself into dangerous tackles?