gerd
Retired Footballer
Very, very good post beachryan.
All things considered most teams, players, managers have no reason so whatsoever to complain about refs and their decisions because nowadays almost all of them go very far to cheat the refs, no wonder refs make mistakes...
And yes deep down referee mistakes and all the contorversy around it is an essential part of football. So we are all a litle bit hypocritical if we complain about refs...perfect referee decisions would be boring.
Refs are also a mean to delude yourself: Genk lost 5-0 against Chelsea and 7-0 against Valencia. Yet early on in both matches one could argue that they were diasadvantaged (Cech could have been sent off for hands and Genk could have had a penalty in Valencia). Would this have changed something, i'm pretty sure that it would have made no difference, but one likes to think it made a difference...so despite the fact that the team played horrible, the ref takes a bit of the blame even when the difference between two teams is huge...
I also agree that refs should be payed more.
And lastly: if a striker misses seven sitters and afterwards the ref does not see a penalty, who is to blame for the fact that this team does not score...IMO it is the striker and not the ref. 99% percent of the fans (including me) will say, the ref is to blame...of course it's the striker...if he scores one or more of the sitters the refs error is totally irrelevant.
All things considered most teams, players, managers have no reason so whatsoever to complain about refs and their decisions because nowadays almost all of them go very far to cheat the refs, no wonder refs make mistakes...
And yes deep down referee mistakes and all the contorversy around it is an essential part of football. So we are all a litle bit hypocritical if we complain about refs...perfect referee decisions would be boring.
Refs are also a mean to delude yourself: Genk lost 5-0 against Chelsea and 7-0 against Valencia. Yet early on in both matches one could argue that they were diasadvantaged (Cech could have been sent off for hands and Genk could have had a penalty in Valencia). Would this have changed something, i'm pretty sure that it would have made no difference, but one likes to think it made a difference...so despite the fact that the team played horrible, the ref takes a bit of the blame even when the difference between two teams is huge...
I also agree that refs should be payed more.
And lastly: if a striker misses seven sitters and afterwards the ref does not see a penalty, who is to blame for the fact that this team does not score...IMO it is the striker and not the ref. 99% percent of the fans (including me) will say, the ref is to blame...of course it's the striker...if he scores one or more of the sitters the refs error is totally irrelevant.
Because on average, throughout the course of the season, they do a much better job and get far less decisions (and at least key ones) wrong.
Where the replay then gets shown and from 4-5 different angles, we can clearly see the foul was committed OUTSIDE the penalty area for example but the ref WRONGLY pointed to the spot. Or when the ball took a deflection and went out of touchline for what SHOULD clearly be a Corner kick but he's instead given a goal-kick and killed the opposition's attack.

