- Staff
- #4,981
I've updated your original post and fixed the links. :thumbup:
It's an interesting review. I like the way they say it's frustrating to be "cheated by a lucky bounce" but in the PES review they don't say "half the deflections will land inch-perfectly at the feet of an oncoming opposition player, over and over and over again, because the game isn't using a real physics engine and therefore can hardly qualify as real football"...
Also, the way they say that they prefer PES's "40-yard belters", yet years ago they would say "FIFA is crap because it's so easy and every goal is a crazy spectacular wonder-goal from 40 yards out".
All the negative reviews seem to say the same thing, "it's too realistic to be fun"; so EA can't win with them, because in the past PES won all the accolades for being the "most realistic" and FIFA was "too arcade".
It's an interesting review. I like the way they say it's frustrating to be "cheated by a lucky bounce" but in the PES review they don't say "half the deflections will land inch-perfectly at the feet of an oncoming opposition player, over and over and over again, because the game isn't using a real physics engine and therefore can hardly qualify as real football"...
Also, the way they say that they prefer PES's "40-yard belters", yet years ago they would say "FIFA is crap because it's so easy and every goal is a crazy spectacular wonder-goal from 40 yards out".
All the negative reviews seem to say the same thing, "it's too realistic to be fun"; so EA can't win with them, because in the past PES won all the accolades for being the "most realistic" and FIFA was "too arcade".
Last edited: