chico
The Peoples Poster!
Re: AN EVERTON VIEW
what you got it on?
what you got it on?
Everton Thread
- Thread starter Blue4life
- Start date
- Thread starter
- #1,202
Last edited:
chico
The Peoples Poster!
chico
The Peoples Poster!
Re: AN EVERTON VIEW
lol blue
lol blue
D
DagsJT
Guest
Re: AN EVERTON VIEW
360. And I'll be buying Guitar Hero:Aerosmith and Rock Band as well
You could try Frets On Fire on the PC too. It's a free game and it's VERY similar (read blatant rip-off) of GH. It'll give you a taste for GH, and you can use the GH guitar on it too
360. And I'll be buying Guitar Hero:Aerosmith and Rock Band as well
You could try Frets On Fire on the PC too. It's a free game and it's VERY similar (read blatant rip-off) of GH. It'll give you a taste for GH, and you can use the GH guitar on it too
chico
The Peoples Poster!
Re: AN EVERTON VIEW
good read this:
Let's talk about Sir Terry Leahy's projects. Let's talk about them in a very specific and personal way. So, without further ado, I present you with this all-important piece of information: I've heard of iconoclastic things like Bulverism and officialism. But I've also heard of things like nonviolence, higher moralities, and treating all beings as ends in and of themselves -- ideas which Leahy's ignorant, unthinking, mentally deficient brain is too small to understand. There is no place in this country where we are safe from Leahy's helots, no place where we are not targeted for hatred and attack. Leahy should start developing the parts of his brain that have been impaired by alarmism. At least then he'll stop trying to muzzle his critics.
You may be surprised to learn that I was once like Leahy. I, too, wanted to infringe upon our most important constitutional rights. It interfered with my judgment, my reasoning, and my ability to argue about Leahy's scare tactics. No matter how close he's come to making me give in to the quacks, witch doctors, charmers, sorcerers and fortune tellers who tell us that unfounded attacks on character, loads of hyperbole, and fallacious information are the best way to make a point, he won't be satisfied until he finds a way to alter, rewrite, or ignore past events to make them consistent with his current "reality". He maintains that he can change his tendentious ways. This is hardly the case. Rather, there is growing evidence that says, to the contrary, that he does not tolerate any view that differs from his own. Rather, Leahy discredits and discards those people who contradict him along with the ideas that they represent.
I wouldn't want to retard the free and natural economic development of various countries' indigenous population. I would, on the other hand, love to disentangle people from the snares set by Leahy and his bedfellows while remaining true to those beliefs, ideals, and aspirations we hold most dear. But, hey, I'm already doing that with this letter. Most people react to his unstable excuses as they would to having a pile of steaming pig manure dumped on their doorstep. Even when they can cope, they resent having to do so. Speaking of resentment, I am deliberately using colorful language in this letter. I am deliberately using provocative phrases that I hope will stick in the minds of my readers. I do ensure, however, that my words are always appropriate and accurate and clearly explain how Leahy's buddies accept his intransigent campaigns without question. Let me try to explain what I mean by that in a single sentence: Even if one is opposed to domineering pessimism (and I am), then surely, Leahy wants to goad the most oleaginous analphabetics you'll ever see into hurling epithets at his enemies. It gets better: He believes that 75 million years ago, a galactic tyrant named Xenu solved the overpopulation problem of his 76-planet federation by transporting the excess people to Earth, chaining them to volcanoes, and dropping H-bombs on them. I guess no one's ever told him that there's something I've observed about him. Namely, he may not know how to spell "stereophotogrammetry" but he unequivocally knows how to commit senseless acts of violence against anyone daring to challenge his duplicitous convictions. I've further observed that there is no excuse for the innumerable errors of fact, the slovenly and philistine artistic judgments, the historical ineptitude, the internal contradictions, and the various half-truths, untruths, and gussied-up truths that litter every one of Leahy's essays from the first word to the last.
Leahy is a counter-productive pamphleteer. I use that label only when it's true. If you don't believe it is, then consider that someone has to be willing to straighten out Leahy's thinking. Even if it's not polite to do so. Even if it hurts a lot of people's feelings. Even if everyone else is pretending that it's okay to leave the educational and emotional needs of our children in the indelicate hands of gormless demoniacs. Is there anyone else out there who's noticed that there are lawsuits in his future? I ask because if we don't deal summarily with the most socially inept yahoos you'll ever see right now, then Leahy's ruses will soon start to metastasize until they eliminate the plebiscitary mechanisms which ensure a free and democratic society.
Leahy insists that everything is happy and fine and good. In the long run, however, he's only fooling himself. Leahy would be better off if he just admitted to himself that he has a knack for convincing oligophrenic beatniks of one sort or another that two wrongs make a right. That's called marketing. The underlying trick is to use sesquipedalian terms like "contradistinctive" and "counterrevolutionize" to keep his sales pitch from sounding amoral. That's why you really have to look hard to see that I defy the intrusive Philistines who sidetrack us, so we can't take stock of what we know, identify areas for further research, and provide a useful starting point for debate on Leahy's pugnacious expostulations, and I defy the powers of darkness that they represent.
Whenever Leahy attempts to dam the flow of effective communication, he looks around waiting for applause as if he's done something decent and moral rather than featherbrained and unbalanced. As for me, I have no bombs, no planes, no artillery, and no terrorist plots. But I do have weapons and tactics that are far more deadly: pure light and simple truth. Well, sure; nothing makes my blood boil more than seeing him put the gods of heaven into the corner as obsolete and outmoded and, in their stead, burn incense to the idol Mammon, but that doesn't change reality.
It is quite common today to hear people express themselves as follows: "Leahy's snow jobs are pockmarked with lascivious alcoholism and other assorted ills." I have this advice to offer: The world has changed, Leahy; get used to it. If we take his screeds to their logical conclusion, we see that within a short period of time, he will keep essential documents hidden from the public until they become politically moot. This seems so obvious, I am amazed there is even any discussion about it. I've said this before, and I'll say it again, but Leahy prefers "Fisking" -- line-by-line rebuttals in which facts are dropped like radar chaff -- to rational debate or building a coherent argument. For proof of this fact I must point out that Leahy's head is so far in rectal defilade it would require major surgery to extricate it. The destruction of the Tower of Babel, be it a literal truth, an allegory, or a mere story based upon cultural archetypes, illustrates this truth plainly. With this in mind, I must free people from the fetters of allotheism's poisonous embrace.
The concepts underlying Leahy's conclusions are like the Ptolemaic astronomy, which could not have been saved by positing more epicycles or eliminating some of the more glaring discrepancies. The fundamental idea -- that the heavens revolve around the Earth -- was wrong, just as Leahy's idea that Jacobinism is a be-all, end-all system that should be forcefully imposed upon us is wrong. It should be clear by this point that we must soon make one of the most momentous decisions in history. We must decide whether to let Leahy impinge upon our daily lives or, alternatively, whether we should develop an alternative community, a cohesive and comprehensive underground with a charter to free his mind from the constricting trammels of extremism and the counterfeit moral inhibitions that have replaced true morality. Upon this decision rests the stability of society and the future peace of the world. My view on this decision is that if I thought that Leahy's undertakings had even a snowball's chance in Hell of doing anything good for anyone, then I wouldn't be so critical. As they stand, however, I can conclude only that if there's an untold story here, it's that some people think I'm exaggerating when I say that Leahy has a deep conviction that every featherless biped, regardless of intelligence, personal achievement, moral character, sense of responsibility, or sanity, should be given the power to abet ethnic genocide, dictatorships, and ill-bred control freaks. But I'm not exaggerating; if anything, I'm understating the situation.
Leahy should show some class, and everyone with half a brain understands that. In general, he gets perfervid about hedonism. Sure, there are exceptions, but griping about Leahy will not make him stop trying to kill the messenger and control the message. But even if it did, he would just find some other way to make serious dialogue difficult or impossible. How I pity him if I were to be his judge. I would start by notifying the jury that Leahy's subalterns were recently seen bombarding me with insults. That's not a one-time accident or oversight. That's Leahy's policy.
We must acknowledge as a people that Leahy has OD'd on vigilantism. Now that's a strong conclusion to draw just from the evidence I've presented in this letter so let me corroborate it by saying that if anything will free us from the shackles of Leahy's out-of-touch opuscula, it's knowledge of the world as it really is. It's knowledge that he gives his most banal statements an appearance of profundity by utilizing polysyllabic words such as "galvanocauterization" and "pseudointernationalistic". That's self-evident, and even Leahy would probably agree with me on that. Even so, his victims have been speaking out for years. Unfortunately, their voices have long been silenced by the roar and thunder of Leahy's votaries, who loudly proclaim that some people deserve to feel safe while others do not. Regardless of those pestilential proclamations, the truth is that he complains a lot. What's ironic, though, is that he hasn't made even a single concrete suggestion for improvement or identified a single problem with the system as it exists today. That's all I have to say about Sir Terry Leahy so I guess I'll stop writing now. Oh, and Leahy: Before you start formulating a smart reply, don't bother because I'm just not interested. Yes, he reads this forum.
From bluekipper forum
good read this:
Let's talk about Sir Terry Leahy's projects. Let's talk about them in a very specific and personal way. So, without further ado, I present you with this all-important piece of information: I've heard of iconoclastic things like Bulverism and officialism. But I've also heard of things like nonviolence, higher moralities, and treating all beings as ends in and of themselves -- ideas which Leahy's ignorant, unthinking, mentally deficient brain is too small to understand. There is no place in this country where we are safe from Leahy's helots, no place where we are not targeted for hatred and attack. Leahy should start developing the parts of his brain that have been impaired by alarmism. At least then he'll stop trying to muzzle his critics.
You may be surprised to learn that I was once like Leahy. I, too, wanted to infringe upon our most important constitutional rights. It interfered with my judgment, my reasoning, and my ability to argue about Leahy's scare tactics. No matter how close he's come to making me give in to the quacks, witch doctors, charmers, sorcerers and fortune tellers who tell us that unfounded attacks on character, loads of hyperbole, and fallacious information are the best way to make a point, he won't be satisfied until he finds a way to alter, rewrite, or ignore past events to make them consistent with his current "reality". He maintains that he can change his tendentious ways. This is hardly the case. Rather, there is growing evidence that says, to the contrary, that he does not tolerate any view that differs from his own. Rather, Leahy discredits and discards those people who contradict him along with the ideas that they represent.
I wouldn't want to retard the free and natural economic development of various countries' indigenous population. I would, on the other hand, love to disentangle people from the snares set by Leahy and his bedfellows while remaining true to those beliefs, ideals, and aspirations we hold most dear. But, hey, I'm already doing that with this letter. Most people react to his unstable excuses as they would to having a pile of steaming pig manure dumped on their doorstep. Even when they can cope, they resent having to do so. Speaking of resentment, I am deliberately using colorful language in this letter. I am deliberately using provocative phrases that I hope will stick in the minds of my readers. I do ensure, however, that my words are always appropriate and accurate and clearly explain how Leahy's buddies accept his intransigent campaigns without question. Let me try to explain what I mean by that in a single sentence: Even if one is opposed to domineering pessimism (and I am), then surely, Leahy wants to goad the most oleaginous analphabetics you'll ever see into hurling epithets at his enemies. It gets better: He believes that 75 million years ago, a galactic tyrant named Xenu solved the overpopulation problem of his 76-planet federation by transporting the excess people to Earth, chaining them to volcanoes, and dropping H-bombs on them. I guess no one's ever told him that there's something I've observed about him. Namely, he may not know how to spell "stereophotogrammetry" but he unequivocally knows how to commit senseless acts of violence against anyone daring to challenge his duplicitous convictions. I've further observed that there is no excuse for the innumerable errors of fact, the slovenly and philistine artistic judgments, the historical ineptitude, the internal contradictions, and the various half-truths, untruths, and gussied-up truths that litter every one of Leahy's essays from the first word to the last.
Leahy is a counter-productive pamphleteer. I use that label only when it's true. If you don't believe it is, then consider that someone has to be willing to straighten out Leahy's thinking. Even if it's not polite to do so. Even if it hurts a lot of people's feelings. Even if everyone else is pretending that it's okay to leave the educational and emotional needs of our children in the indelicate hands of gormless demoniacs. Is there anyone else out there who's noticed that there are lawsuits in his future? I ask because if we don't deal summarily with the most socially inept yahoos you'll ever see right now, then Leahy's ruses will soon start to metastasize until they eliminate the plebiscitary mechanisms which ensure a free and democratic society.
Leahy insists that everything is happy and fine and good. In the long run, however, he's only fooling himself. Leahy would be better off if he just admitted to himself that he has a knack for convincing oligophrenic beatniks of one sort or another that two wrongs make a right. That's called marketing. The underlying trick is to use sesquipedalian terms like "contradistinctive" and "counterrevolutionize" to keep his sales pitch from sounding amoral. That's why you really have to look hard to see that I defy the intrusive Philistines who sidetrack us, so we can't take stock of what we know, identify areas for further research, and provide a useful starting point for debate on Leahy's pugnacious expostulations, and I defy the powers of darkness that they represent.
Whenever Leahy attempts to dam the flow of effective communication, he looks around waiting for applause as if he's done something decent and moral rather than featherbrained and unbalanced. As for me, I have no bombs, no planes, no artillery, and no terrorist plots. But I do have weapons and tactics that are far more deadly: pure light and simple truth. Well, sure; nothing makes my blood boil more than seeing him put the gods of heaven into the corner as obsolete and outmoded and, in their stead, burn incense to the idol Mammon, but that doesn't change reality.
It is quite common today to hear people express themselves as follows: "Leahy's snow jobs are pockmarked with lascivious alcoholism and other assorted ills." I have this advice to offer: The world has changed, Leahy; get used to it. If we take his screeds to their logical conclusion, we see that within a short period of time, he will keep essential documents hidden from the public until they become politically moot. This seems so obvious, I am amazed there is even any discussion about it. I've said this before, and I'll say it again, but Leahy prefers "Fisking" -- line-by-line rebuttals in which facts are dropped like radar chaff -- to rational debate or building a coherent argument. For proof of this fact I must point out that Leahy's head is so far in rectal defilade it would require major surgery to extricate it. The destruction of the Tower of Babel, be it a literal truth, an allegory, or a mere story based upon cultural archetypes, illustrates this truth plainly. With this in mind, I must free people from the fetters of allotheism's poisonous embrace.
The concepts underlying Leahy's conclusions are like the Ptolemaic astronomy, which could not have been saved by positing more epicycles or eliminating some of the more glaring discrepancies. The fundamental idea -- that the heavens revolve around the Earth -- was wrong, just as Leahy's idea that Jacobinism is a be-all, end-all system that should be forcefully imposed upon us is wrong. It should be clear by this point that we must soon make one of the most momentous decisions in history. We must decide whether to let Leahy impinge upon our daily lives or, alternatively, whether we should develop an alternative community, a cohesive and comprehensive underground with a charter to free his mind from the constricting trammels of extremism and the counterfeit moral inhibitions that have replaced true morality. Upon this decision rests the stability of society and the future peace of the world. My view on this decision is that if I thought that Leahy's undertakings had even a snowball's chance in Hell of doing anything good for anyone, then I wouldn't be so critical. As they stand, however, I can conclude only that if there's an untold story here, it's that some people think I'm exaggerating when I say that Leahy has a deep conviction that every featherless biped, regardless of intelligence, personal achievement, moral character, sense of responsibility, or sanity, should be given the power to abet ethnic genocide, dictatorships, and ill-bred control freaks. But I'm not exaggerating; if anything, I'm understating the situation.
Leahy should show some class, and everyone with half a brain understands that. In general, he gets perfervid about hedonism. Sure, there are exceptions, but griping about Leahy will not make him stop trying to kill the messenger and control the message. But even if it did, he would just find some other way to make serious dialogue difficult or impossible. How I pity him if I were to be his judge. I would start by notifying the jury that Leahy's subalterns were recently seen bombarding me with insults. That's not a one-time accident or oversight. That's Leahy's policy.
We must acknowledge as a people that Leahy has OD'd on vigilantism. Now that's a strong conclusion to draw just from the evidence I've presented in this letter so let me corroborate it by saying that if anything will free us from the shackles of Leahy's out-of-touch opuscula, it's knowledge of the world as it really is. It's knowledge that he gives his most banal statements an appearance of profundity by utilizing polysyllabic words such as "galvanocauterization" and "pseudointernationalistic". That's self-evident, and even Leahy would probably agree with me on that. Even so, his victims have been speaking out for years. Unfortunately, their voices have long been silenced by the roar and thunder of Leahy's votaries, who loudly proclaim that some people deserve to feel safe while others do not. Regardless of those pestilential proclamations, the truth is that he complains a lot. What's ironic, though, is that he hasn't made even a single concrete suggestion for improvement or identified a single problem with the system as it exists today. That's all I have to say about Sir Terry Leahy so I guess I'll stop writing now. Oh, and Leahy: Before you start formulating a smart reply, don't bother because I'm just not interested. Yes, he reads this forum.
From bluekipper forum
chico
The Peoples Poster!
Re: AN EVERTON VIEW
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Terry_Leahy
incase someone on here doesnt know who we are talking about!
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Terry_Leahy
incase someone on here doesnt know who we are talking about!
chico
The Peoples Poster!
Re: AN EVERTON VIEW
http://www.evertonfc.com/news/archive/sir-terry-leahy-open-letter.html?page=2
this swung the vote imo
http://www.evertonfc.com/news/archive/sir-terry-leahy-open-letter.html?page=2
this swung the vote imo
chico
The Peoples Poster!
Re: AN EVERTON VIEW
http://www.knowsley.gov.uk/resources/228342/RegenerationBenefitsRevised.pdf
dies inside
http://www.knowsley.gov.uk/resources/228342/RegenerationBenefitsRevised.pdf
dies inside
- Thread starter
- #1,210
- Thread starter
- #1,211
- Thread starter
- #1,212
Re: AN EVERTON VIEW
well spotted chico......
what does the plank shout at the end?
phil the snout thompson.........red-shite tosser.
well spotted chico......
what does the plank shout at the end?
phil the snout thompson.........red-shite tosser.
Last edited:
Plan M
Banned
- 27 September 2007
- Manchester United
Re: AN EVERTON VIEW
He is the biggest tosser in football - why the bias twat has a job in tv baffles me.
GREAT find though lads!
He is the biggest tosser in football - why the bias twat has a job in tv baffles me.
GREAT find though lads!
- Thread starter
- #1,215
chico
The Peoples Poster!
Re: AN EVERTON VIEW
would love him dudu and kallstrom!!!!
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=n1-qkjEvpMc&feature=related
would love him dudu and kallstrom!!!!
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=n1-qkjEvpMc&feature=related
chico
The Peoples Poster!
chico
The Peoples Poster!
- Thread starter
- #1,219
Re: AN EVERTON VIEW
ha ha ha that still kills me, we murdered the shite that day!
reina is so bad!!!........
ha ha ha that still kills me, we murdered the shite that day!
reina is so bad!!!........
- Thread starter
- #1,220
antred
Banned
- 15 August 2003
Re: AN EVERTON VIEW
Wow its playtime in the creche.
IN MOYES WE TRUST....
CHECK OUT ANDY GRAYS HAIR........HA
Wow its playtime in the creche.
chico
The Peoples Poster!
Re: AN EVERTON VIEW
Goodison Park has staged more top-flight football games than any other ground in the United Kingdom and was the only English club ground to host a semi-final at the 1966 FIFA World Cup. It was also the first English ground to have undersoil heating, the first to have two tiers on all sides and the first to have a three-tier stand. Goodison is the only stadium in the world that features a church in its grounds—St Luke the Evangelist—at the corner of the Main Stand and the Gwladys Street End.
Goodison Park has staged more top-flight football games than any other ground in the United Kingdom and was the only English club ground to host a semi-final at the 1966 FIFA World Cup. It was also the first English ground to have undersoil heating, the first to have two tiers on all sides and the first to have a three-tier stand. Goodison is the only stadium in the world that features a church in its grounds—St Luke the Evangelist—at the corner of the Main Stand and the Gwladys Street End.
- Thread starter
- #1,223
Re: AN EVERTON VIEW
ALAN BALL DAY
The man the footballer the legend that is alan ball is given due respect on http://www.evertonfc.com/home/ one year on from his death, check out the tributes from all who loved alan ball.
'Once Everton has touched you, nothing will ever be the same'. alan ball
ALAN BALL DAY
The man the footballer the legend that is alan ball is given due respect on http://www.evertonfc.com/home/ one year on from his death, check out the tributes from all who loved alan ball.
'Once Everton has touched you, nothing will ever be the same'. alan ball
chico
The Peoples Poster!
Re: AN EVERTON VIEW
god bless alan, what a legend
god bless alan, what a legend
chico
The Peoples Poster!
- Thread starter
- #1,226
chico
The Peoples Poster!
Re: AN EVERTON VIEW
check out the coupon on dixie dean!!
dave hickson the legend
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=cYNoiLcAr38&feature=related
check out the coupon on dixie dean!!
dave hickson the legend
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=cYNoiLcAr38&feature=related
chico
The Peoples Poster!
Re: AN EVERTON VIEW
do you know who that song is by?
do you know who that song is by?
- Thread starter
- #1,229
Re: AN EVERTON VIEW
Looks like we are heavily linked with arshavin chico, what ya think on him, i guess i just havent seen enough of him but have faith in moyes he buys well, hate seeing teams like fiorentina and zenit in the semis, espec after beating both! we just were to cautious in the away leg , i really feel we could have won the uefa cup this year. miss those thursday nights man.....
Looks like we are heavily linked with arshavin chico, what ya think on him, i guess i just havent seen enough of him but have faith in moyes he buys well, hate seeing teams like fiorentina and zenit in the semis, espec after beating both! we just were to cautious in the away leg , i really feel we could have won the uefa cup this year. miss those thursday nights man.....
- Thread starter
- #1,230
Re: AN EVERTON VIEW
no mate its awful, sounds like your man next door or sumit......lol
brilliant video though great memories, beating the shite with andy king and graeme sharp screamers, beating bayern munich in the semi, andy gray and gary lineker were f**king awesome i loved those days, there coming back!
no mate its awful, sounds like your man next door or sumit......lol
brilliant video though great memories, beating the shite with andy king and graeme sharp screamers, beating bayern munich in the semi, andy gray and gary lineker were f**king awesome i loved those days, there coming back!
Last edited: