MO_DINERO, take off your red tinted glasses. Lampard and Gerrard are not the same type of player, (even though everyone seems to think they are) but even if they were, lampard would definately be up there with gerrard. I know gerrard is amazing, and basically single handedly wins you games, but thats because he has to, Lampard doesnt. Gerrard doesnt have the players around him like Lampard, lampard doesnt need to defend as much because he has the worlds best holding midfielder to back him up, gerrard has sissoko (who i personally dont rate) and alonso, who i think is awesome, but not a fully defensive midfielder.
Lampard is solely a central/attacking midfielder, gerrard is an all round midfielder.
If we compare them solely on being attacking midfielders, lampard wins hands down, 15 in the league this season. Gerrard would win as the overall midfielder, but we've never seen lampard do that, and thats not his position.
It's like saying gerrard is a better player than kaka, it just doesn't work comparing them.
Anyway, i think lampard is more important than gerrard to the england team (i swear no bias in this comment), because he scores a lot of goals for england in his advanced midfield role, and we all know gerrad has never really reproduced his form for liverpool for england continuosly.
I think the people on that website voted for gerrard after his performances this season for his club, and have not thought about his form for england.