JayM
International
Was the same as Jenas's against Arsenal and he has his tooken away.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature currently requires accessing the site using the built-in Safari browser.
100% agree with everything in this post.ClassicD said:I'll post this now while it's fresh in my mind.
Not usually one for blaming officials for results, but the simple fact is the referee handed Rangers that match with his decision making.
Thompson's was never a red card (deja vu from last season, with Lovenkrands being 'headbutted' :roll: ). If it was, why was Camara not even booked for making an identical tackle in the second half? Why was Ian Murray not booked for his slide tackle on Maloney for the penalty, which would have been his second yellow and thus a red card?
Prso's was never a penalty. Petrov stood his ground, Prso booted it by him then ran into him and fell over, arms flailing as if he'd been felled by Vasili Zytsev in the stand.
As for the team's performance it's hard to judge, because the referee turned this game. Initially thought the decision to play Beattie instead of Maloney was iffy, and thought taking off Shunsuke when Beattie had done nothing was also the wrong choice - any sustained threat we had died at that point.
Camara had an excellent game bar a couple of iffy passes, defended very well. Telfer was sleeping for the opener and wasn't one of the better players. As mentioned, Beattie was terrible. Petrov was probably MOTM. Lennon didn't do anything different in terms of his play but he should have been a bit more savvy with his comments and actions as he is the captain. Hartson had no support.
The referee had an awful game. The positive thing is even after going down to 10 men in the first half we had more of the match than Rangers (HT stats showed more shots, and more free-kicks). This Rangers team are not impressive in the least and even with the referee's performance they still didn't dominate the game.
Disappointed but more with the referee than our team.
Eddie2005 said:fuck right off ya tarrier scumbags!!!!!!
ClassicD said:Scored a good goal but didn't do much else, pretty quiet from my view but then I wasn't focusing on his performance. Except the fact that he dives a lot. :roll:
Cloud1863 said:I dont agree that the ref handed the game to the gers , I dont think the the Thomson desicion was a str8 red card but think the ref gave for the intent in the challeng , thompson was no where near the ball . Now the pen u r talking about apart from the fact he was clearly obstructed the game was all but finished at that point . With 11 v 11 it may have made the game closer but still think Rangers would have had enough to win the game, Celtic rearly threatend and all Nakamura really done was have a free kick that was close so I dont think its fair so blame a ref on a game where Celtic could have had 12 men and it wouldn't have made a difference. I'm sure u will say its a biased point of view put to be fair the same can go both ways.
NakamuraTheTim said:This will probably sound like sour grapes but every crucial decision the ref made went in favour of the huns.
Booking Hartson early on for backchat resulted in Hartson scared to throw his weight around.
Sending off Thommo but failing to send off Murray, Rodrigues and Ferguson for similar tackles.
Letting Ferguson away with numerous offences, which included a kick at Lennon 4 yards from the ref in the build up to their second goal.
Not booking Murray for bringing down Maloney in the box which was a yellow card offence. He was already on a yellow at the time.
Awarding the huns a ridiculous penalty seconds after we were back in the game.
The ref spoiled the game but I seen enough in the first half to suggest that we would have got a result at Mordor if it wasn't for Stuart Dougall.
We shouldn't have been surprised though. We have only played 4 SPL games this season and already the huns have benefited from mahor decisions in 3 out of their 4 games. Its funny how the only game they have lost is when the ref called it straight down the middle.
Here is a rundown of their games so far
Game 1
Rangers V Livingston
Livy denied a penalty and have a man wrongly red carded. Rangers end up winning 3-0.
Game 2
ICT v Rangers
ICT are all over the huns and the ICT player bursts into the box and is brought down by FanFan. Everyone can see its a penalty except the officials. Rangers go on to sneak a 1-0 win.
Game 3
Aberdeen V Rangers
Ricksen commits several heavy challenges, squares up to various Aberdeen players and one of his own. Finally shown a second yellow, he could have walked earlier. Rangers lose 3-2
Game 4
Rangers v Celtic
5 minutes gone and the Ref books Hartson for some backchat effectively putting an end to his physical side of the game. Red card's Thompson for his first tackle of the game, a yellow and a warning was enough. Shows Murray and Rodrigues yellow cards for simillar tackles.
Fails to take action against Ferguson for various offences including a tackle from behind and raised hands.
Murray brings down Maloney in the box - result is a penalty but he fails to show Murray a yellow card, which the offence clearly merited. This would have resulted in Murray being sent off.
Awards Rangers a penalty when Prso clearly dives. This means that Rangers are spared a nervous last few minutes.
Scottish football is rotten to the core much like Rangers FC. We will never get a fair crack of the whip against that lot.
NakamuraTheTim said:I totally respect your opinion mate but unless you live or have lived in Scotland(especially the West Coast) its hard to understand what actually goes on here. In my opinion our game is corrupt.
A few years ago Fergus McCann our previous owner exposed the then Head of the SFA Jim Farry for blatant corruption. Farry deliberately held up Jorge Cadette's registration so that he would miss our game against the huns. This was proven and Farry lost his job. This incident says it all about Scottish football.
We also have the debacle at Tynecastle last season where Rangers were awarded a last minute penalty by the linesman. The ref Hugh Dallas awarded a goal kick but he listened to a well known Rangers supporter who was running the line and Rangers win the game 2-1. It was one of the worst penalty decisions of all time. It has to be seen to be believed.
This may seem paranoid to some but its what I believe and I just hope someday Celtic can get out of Scotland and leave all this pish behind including Rangers. We don't need them and the quicker we get rid of the 'Old Firm' tag the better.
"Peter Lovenkrands set me up well for my goal. I was tackled, but preferred to stay on my feet rather than go down.
"I was in a good position, and it was better to try my luck than to win a free-kick."
ClassicD said:Have you heard Buffel's comments?
He "preferred" to stay on his feet? Since when was it a choice? If you're choosing to go down then you're diving! Little shit.
Neil Lennon might have done what you say but can you tell me you've never said anything of that sort against the Celtic fans etc...truebluenose said:In reply to your question of why I think NL is a bigot. Last season he could be clearly seen on tv mouthing "orange b****rds" at the rangers fans and he was filmed spitting not once but twice on a rangers scarf to antagonise the crowd. I rest my case. Explain that one Quincy without denying it ever happened which I'm sure you'll attempt anyway.
Na mate you're hilarious. Ricksen was given captaincy and behaved honourably last season - a lot better than the behaviour I'm sure you're referring to before his captaincy and last week. The only incidents you've given me for barry in regard to his behaviour as captain have been off the pitch. The only incidents I can give you in terms of lennon and his behaviour as captain have been on the pitch. I know where I'd want my captain to be doin the business.
Celtic fans need to learn to take defeat and not point to stupid unproven conspiracies and rumour. After all your 'glory' days are behinds you so you better get used to losing pal.
fd1972uk said:I can't recall NL calling them that
fd1972uk said:is that one of them lip reader geniuses.
fd1972uk said:Maybe I'd need to sit and study it like some sad cunt.
Buffel is saying he had the choice to go down or not but chose to stay on his feet and "try his luck". What I am saying, is that the very fact he believes he had any choice tells you what's going on in his head - you don't have a choice of going down if you're fouled, if you're fouled to a degree that you go down then that's that - if you go down when you've not been fouled to that degree then it's diving. Does that clear it up for you?truebluenose said:He's a "little shit" because he has integrity and when tackled tries his hardest to stay on his feet rather go to ground. From his comments I dont get where you mnage to come to the conclusion that he is a cheat seein as he never actually dived. He's havin a go at divers ie. Petrov but you are obviously too blinkered to see it.