Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature currently requires accessing the site using the built-in Safari browser.
He really is a little shit.
Thats the problem we dont keep our best players!!!
No suprise...
Thats the way English footballers are ... most of them!!!
The main reason i think is money and popularity those things make them arrogant!!
EDIT:
I just had and crazy idea if Fabregas leaves why shouldn't we go for Kaka he is unsettled in Real and would fill in Fab's spot.Why not to splash the cash on him!.....Oh yeah the reason why not is Wenger and his head!I think he would do well in Arsenal!!
Wilshire looks like a nasty piece of shit judging by the news, but hey, we need more cunts! We should go for Van Bommel and, who knows, Barton, to put out a couple Montecristos No. 5's on Shawcross.
Exactly the kind of personality they need more of though. Back in the days of the "Invincibles", they were almost all cunts.
Also people think if we had 100 million we can get all of these players! you don't seem to realise that even if we had the money, would these players want to come to us? would Kaka want to come to us? when we can't pay him as much as much bigger clubs that would take him?
There is so much to take into account when buying players, it sounds like most people think if Wenger was willing to spend we would have all of the greatest players in the world at Arsenal
Buying players is long and complicated, especially when you are not the Man Uniteds, Barcelona's, Real Madrids. Or especially if you have not been bought by somebody who throws 100's of millions of pounds around.
Gervinho's too good to be a back-up.
So is Cesc Fabregas worth as much as Andy Carroll, 35 million pounds? The survey says no.
http://www.guardian.co.uk/football/poll/2011/jun/30/andy-carroll-cesc-fabregas
Goes without saying.My point was that we just need players that want to be at Arsenal that are very good, maybe not world class.
Goes without saying.
I think he'd be first choice on the right wing of their 4-2-3-1. He'd be a better choice than Walcott, Arshavin, Bendtner, Rosicky etc. Even Nasri, who looks better in the centre or on the left.I've seen Gervinho regularly with Beveren and Lille.
It would not be the first time that i'm completely wrong, bu i'm not sure he is good enough to be a strong holder for Arsenal...a good squad player, yes... a regular first team player? Maybe. A strong holder: i don't think so...but to put this in perspective: i had also doubts about Vermaelen.
Do you think you'd need a world class replacement for Fabregas? Given how well stocked you lot are in midfield, a wise thing would be to give Nasri that central role he thrived in at the start of last season or even move Wilshere up into that role (wasn't that his original role in the reserve/youth sides) and then buy someone like M'Vila to beef up the midfield.Not really, because lots of people are saying we need to buy world class players
I think he'd be first choice on the right wing of their 4-2-3-1. He'd be a better choice than Walcott, Arshavin, Bendtner, Rosicky etc. Even Nasri, who looks better in the centre or on the left.
Do you think you'd need a world class replacement for Fabregas? Given how well stocked you lot are in midfield, a wise thing would be to give Nasri that central role he thrived in at the start of last season or even move Wilshere up into that role (wasn't that his original role in the reserve/youth sides) and then buy someone like M'Vila to beef up the midfield.
Even if Fab stays, I think buying an improvement on Song would be a good idea. You could then shift Song down the pecking order, improving your strength in depth and maybe ship out the likes of Denilson, Rosicky and Arshavin who seem surplus to requirements.
Sorry for going all FM on ya.