B
BillyBoy
Guest
Re: PES2010 News & Rumours thread
Nice cover.
Nice cover.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature currently requires accessing the site using the built-in Safari browser.
Wow - haven't been on this forum for ages but, predictably, it hasn't changed. Same old 'we need a new engine', '360 dribbling' prattling by people who don't know what either of those things are.
How about we wait and see... Just saw a Fifa 10 video and frankly that looks like the same loose gameplay with poor shooting and I can't see any evidence of this so-called 360 dribbling there either... not that I care because I think the whole thing is a red herring anyway.
I've never known so many people crave something so much that they've never actually seen! I mean never mind the fact that the teams are called Man Red and West London White - it's all about 360 dribbling! The game will be unplayable without 360 dribbling, just like the first 6 PESs were! Man they were seriously bad - I had to stop playing them because there was no 360 dribbling! I can't live without it! [For the simpletons on this forum that was actually sarcasm]
Get a grip guys - since when has PES looked good from a distance? Everyone knows it's about how it plays and if it plays as well as PES 6 (which didn't have 360 dribbling or a new engine) then I'll be happy.
My view: game looks promising, better than Fifa by a mile IMO and can't wait to try the demo. Only then will I start slating or admiring it.
So because a game in the past never had it Konami shouldnt be looking to improve future games and add new things? Surely that argument could be made with any game.
Technology has changed and improved and that means the software should follow the same pattern. There would of been things Konami would of wanted to do back in the PES6 days which wouldnt of been possible. You would of hoped with next gen they could implement those ideas they couldnt before. If you just want a re-hash of PES6 then good luck to you.
There's no bigger turn off than each year's "you know who"'s obsession and trickling of news concerning the cover stars. TBH I don't give a crap about who'll be on the game's cover. As a matter of fact, if putting two GI Joe toys on the front would save more money for game development, or a new camera angle, I'd always go for that option.
I can't believe someone out there thinks that this year's cover stars is a megaton announcement or HUGE news worth leaking bit by bit through clues in podcasts.
Thought W.E.N.B. had all the exclusives.
PESFAN have beaten them to every story this year.
Change the record mate.
PES isn't meant to replicate the game as seen on TV. It is meant to replicate the drama, instinct and ebb and flow of the actual sport first and foremost.
Change the record mate.
There is actually nothing wrong with PES' wide cam at all. As far as it's use for a videogame goes it is perfect. PES isn't meant to replicate the game as seen on TV. It is meant to replicate the drama, instinct and ebb and flow of the actual sport first and foremost.
I hope they have included the Wii versions subtle zoom feature as play approaches either goal area though.
You clearly live on the moon with your idea of physicsYou dont have a clue about football, stick with Madden bud, leave the real football to those who know.You cleary have never played the game. I have nothing to debate with you.
Great find Junka with the photo of Kaka, awesome.
Replicate the drama. You said it. This is done by replicating reality, making the experience more dramatic. I am far from the only one who wanted panning back, which was on old-gen pes. Also, FIFA10 has had customizable cameras for about 8 years now. Finally, wouldn't you agree that having a visible reactive crowd through the widecam ingame would add more to the drama, creating a more authentic experience with a simple "option" that used to be in the old games?
This mean that I cant change club after season in master league in PES 2010 ? Catch I your answer good ?No and this has allready been confirmed.
Not all Gerd. I dont really care where he's from, and trust me this isnt about which is the better game. It's about the footballing physics. His ignornance holds no boundries. Watching football certainly doesnt make you an expert on the subject. What I wrote is correct. If he doesnt understand where I'm coming from then I cant teach him.
I really dont know what else to say. I've played the real game for 25 years. I get paid to play football. I know what I'm talking about. I dont know about pretty much else, but I do know my football. Thats it.
He has had a go a few times. I would love to know what makes him an expert to judge me in the manner of which he does. If he know's the game like you say he does, then let him PM me about what he believes is inaccurate with what I wrote. Lets talk off this thread about physics, I would love to know his views, I really would.
Lets move on and get back OT.
Replicate the drama. You said it. This is done by replicating reality, making the experience more dramatic. I am far from the only one who wanted panning back, which was on old-gen pes. Also, FIFA10 has had customizable cameras for about 8 years now. Finally, wouldn't you agree that having a visible reactive crowd through the widecam ingame would add more to the drama?
If the goal was to replicate the feeling you get playing the sport, you'd be playing with a first person view, or similar to the BAL or BaP camera.I just don't think it - or visible crowds in wide cam - are absolute necessities in adding more drama. It is all about what happens on the pitch, just like it is when playing the real sport.
If the goal was to replicate the feeling you get playing the sport, you'd be playing with a first person view, or similar to the BAL or BaP camera.
The idea is to watch a game on TV where you control the team you're supporting. Reliving the same feeling you'd get if this team actually scores a goal in a real UEFA champions league you're watcting on TV or in a stadium.
Again, there's absolutely no comparison between PES's atmosphere and what other games have achieved like NBA2k9.
Your tone has a prevalent "PES is just fine the way it is please don't change it KONAMI"... which I think is what caused the lag behind FIFA in the next-gen, when PES production took fans literal suggestions (me one of them) to just have PES5 gameplay with FIFA's graphics.
Just looking at them pics two points come to mind, in picture 1 see how the two players have completly gone missing in relation to the ball.one of the many frustrating things with 2009.
In picture 2 i hope konami have finally changed these tired old banners.Please konami no more "who ate all the pies" because i did and it reminds me what a fat b**tard i am
I'm sorry, but you are frankly way wide of the mark in so many aspects.
Sorry mate, but cloth physics are the furthest thing from my mind when playing the game.
Power = height ...2. I cant really understand the whole shooting argument - In a perfect world you can pan the PES model but when you compare it FIFA - I think it wins every time.
You clearly live on the moon with your idea of physics
Well I may not have played professionally for 20 years the way you did, but I played with both my school, university and club teams and competed nationally. Sorry about your ankle injury, though I hope things turned out for the best.
Cloth physics are the furthest thing from my mind as well. I too want PES to primiarily focus on the agility, preciseness, and true spirit of the game. I'm talking about small things that produce big impacts in the game, the same way NBA 2K9's presentation delivers.
It's as if you're saying you ONLY want the things that really matter in the game, and nothing else. Whereas I'm saying please just bring back things that were already in previous iterations of the game and removed before, as well as things that other sports games have successfully replicated years ago.
Obviously the technology is still lagging behind in the way of true replication of the game, which is more of a reason why they should include the "easy" small things that affect the atmosphere of the game immensly. Why else do you think modders and patchers each year compete to create realistic TV scoreboards, to make the game look a bit more like what is delivered on TV?
I'm sorry, but you are frankly way wide of the mark in so many aspects.
First of all, you are the one being far too literal if you think that capturing the sport can only be done via a Bal or Bap mode. You are not thinking outside the box at all. I have played the game at a decent-ish level for some 20yrs, until a horrific ankle injury has seen me have to call it a day. Not that you need to play at a high level of competition to understand what football is really all about.
When I play PES, and I exclude the last two years next gen efforts for a myriad of reasons, I get a similar buzz - or at least as close as you can get sitting in a room with a controller looking at a screen - to that which I get when playing the game. It demands the instinct, quick mindedness and composure that is required when I play for real. It doesn't obviously capture the athleticism and agility required, but what it does do to stay true to the feeling of playing the game is that it understands that football - tactics, strategy, and opposition aside - is an incredibly simple game to play. The human body may well have it's own mechanics, but the human brain makes these complex actions incredibly simple to perform depending on each individuals agility and athleticism. The feeling of individuality that PES offers therefore does a pretty stand up job replicating this aspect of the real sport. With each and every player I pass too, I get that connection with them and try to play to there strengths. It feels like I am the Ronaldinho, Xavi or Maldini that was in possession, and likewise it felt like I was up against these players when they were COM controlled opposition.
FIFA on the other hand - despite it being a great wee game in it's own right - over complicates the mechanics of playing the real sport, and as a result that individuality along with instinct and natural flair removes the sensation of drama as suddenly I feel like I am not really in the game but just controlling wonderfully animated models who all seem to play like one another bar pace.
Regards my 'tone', again you couldn't be more wrong. I want the game to capture all that I have said above first and foremost as it is what makes or breaks the game, then focus on aesthetics. I don't think PES is just fine the way it is regards graphics and animation, but I do feel they have the core philosophy aced in many respects and that is what I want to see evolve.
If you think that PES is primarily meant to capture the feeling of watching the game from your arm chair or in the stands then you miss the point of the game completely. Sure, having that sensation is a great addition, but I honestly couldn't care less about camera angles with visible crowds so long as they allow me to play the game well. I am not objecting to your wishes, I just don't think that they are as important as you seem to think.
Gameplay is everything, and this can only be enhanced, but not revolutionised as you seem to think by the aesthetics you wish for.
Sorry mate, but cloth physics are the furthest thing from my mind when playing the game.
And as for the new game, you praised a goal by Henry where messi crossed from right to left with the outside of his left foot over 30 yards right to henry's foot!!! You gotta be kidding me if you think this is possible. MAYBE JUST MAYBE, they put a driving club on messi's foot and replaced the ball with a golf ball so he could dog leg it left like that.... Please explain how in the hell messi can do that, and please dont just say "I'm paid to play football so I just know" and if you are paid to play football let us know when your next game is so we can watch on tv and see you do this incredibly ridiculous cross
But, I think there has to be some artistic license in certain areas MJ when you working on creating a stat based performance game. Like the Messi cross that got slated. True, looking back he did need a little more backlift, but the theory behind the cross is that of sublime technique. The animation may not have matched the cross in that particular case but 8/9 times out of 10 it does.
But that isnt the issue. What Konami are doing is saying a player of Messi's quality is capable of making such a cross with the outside of the boot, with accuracy. I have played PES 2009 to death and the vast majority of players in the game wouldnt have even attempted the outside of the boot technique, never mind completed the pass successfully. Forget the animation for now, that isnt the point.
Written in an earlier post
If you can't see any evidence of this "so-called" 360-dribbling in FIFA10's videos, then that tells me you have no idea what 360 degree dribbling is. Sorry if I was too harsh.
It sure would be brilliant if Messi had a decent "outside of the foot" crossing animation, where his leg has more backlift and continues moving tangencially to the ball...
Not harsh at all - you have simply backed up my point. I don't know what 360 dribbling is, which is probably why I can't see/recognise it, and probably why I don't care much for it.
Do you know what 360 dribbling is? I am keen to be enlightened. Perhaps you could point me in the direction of a youtube clip of Fifa or PES gameplay that clearly illustrates the difference?