a)lungberg would never have gotten the ball had contact not been made
Not sure what you mean here, Ljungberg touched the ball before contact was made, he was clattered after he'd touched the ball.
b)are you sure it wasnt shoulder to shoulder tackle off the ball, which is legal, ask any referee
Not when one player has just pushed the ball ahead and is taken off his feet by the opposition player, who doesn't touch any of the ball. A shoulder tackle is when one player is in possession of the ball and the other leans into him. If you are saying that challenge was a shoulder tackle then you're having a laugh! :lol:
c)how do you know ronaldo would have not been fouled? It was clearly two bad calls, two wrongs dont make a right, but there is such a thing as make up calls, and that was one of them
Because that exact scenario would not have arrived had the penalty not been given. I admit that should have been a penalty.
d)one goal was contraversial, the other was not, so i dont know how you can say arsenal was cheated, that is too harsh and not a nuetral point of view as a neutral can clearly see the game was 2-0 not 1-0.........
The only reason Man Utd scored a second was because Arsenal had to push forward so much in the final stages for an equaliser, because they were 1-0 down to the goal being debated. IMO, Man Utd did not look like scoring at all, Arsenal were coping fine with them until that decision, and then they had to take more risks. Again, if you're saying it was 2-0 anyway so the PK didn't matter, you're not being completely honest about it.
I wanted to see the best side win, and neither deserved to, Arsenal didn't look like scoring either.
P.S. if it had been Johnny Foreigner diving for the PK you'd have all the pundits immediately calling it as it was - a dive, but because it's Rooney that word isn't ever mentioned, instead he's "conned the ref" or "there wasn't much contact". Rooney dived, end of.
Great post.