Talking about Chelsea, we had spent few and earned more than United did this 2 years.
By selling the players you bought for > 100m the years before that. Sound logic. You should be in finance!
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature currently requires accessing the site using the built-in Safari browser.
Talking about Chelsea, we had spent few and earned more than United did this 2 years.
Yea, I wouldn't sign Kane for that kind of money. Too big a risk when he could turn into another Darren Bent.
It's not as if the price would be higher if he had another good season anyway.
Talking about Chelsea, we had spent few and earned more than United did this 2 years.
You're all forgetting about Blind. I don't blame you but still.
By selling the players you bought for > 100m the years before that. Sound logic. You should be in finance!
I am talking about the last 2 years in transfer. Hence, you saying that we spent more recently is purely illogical.
http://www.transferleague.co.uk/chelsea/english-football-teams/chelsea-transfers
http://www.transferleague.co.uk/manchester-united/english-football-teams/manchester-united-transfers
Not sure what you mean, been a very good signing for us.
He's mocking them lol!!!
You can't sign Muller as you're already at the max for your diving quota