Jumbo_
-
Re: Liverpool Thread
hey, newcastle were class in the the championship.
hey, newcastle were class in the the championship.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
But the manager wont get anywhere near £100m of that to actually spend on players. I'd be surprised if they got £10m.
The money from sales will go straight to the owners or the debt. Rafa was told this in a meeting, he wanted assurances that player sales will go into a transfer pot and they couldn't give him that assurance.


I totally agree about that the only thing they care is about their pockets. And for that reason I cant imagine our best players being sold this summer because if they sell Gerrard and Torres, who the hell is going to buy our club ? I think we are going to sell Mascherano though, but I dont neither Gerrard or Torres, leaving. I hope Im right.Surely, you'd think? Right?
They don't care. They want to sell up and leave with as much profit as they can, they don't give a shit about potential or the team. Just their pockets.
As I said, we are fucked. Newcastle style.


Indeed, even though it was a couple of years on, Rafa was still angry that young players like Walcott, Ramsey and Pato had all been approached well before they ended up moving to other big clubs, and that the two British teenagers had even been in his office for transfer talks. But much to Benítez’s chagrin, Rick Parry felt there were better players already at the Academy, and refused to sanction a bid of just £1.5m for Ramsey. A manager is judged on his transfer record, but time and time again Benítez wanted a top player (Simao, Alves), but had to make do with a cheap alternative (Pennant, Arbeloa). Sometimes it worked, sometimes it didn’t.

Post taken from another forum but sums up my viewpoint on the article and Rafa in general:
I have to say that I agree with much of that. One of the problems is that some Liverpool fans have been so eager and, to a point, desperate, to shift any blame from Benitez to other factors that it has naturally caused both pundits, as well as fans of other clubs and even many Liverpool fans, themselves, to become suspicious. Some of it has been truly cringe-worthy, and that has rightly spawned many of the threads both on here and elsewhere mocking what became for some a cult of personality (which, by the way, is almost certainly influenced by the other problems at the club).
But re-writing history works both ways. Just as it's not honest to pretend that Benitez is a legend on a par with Shankly and Paisely, or that he could not have done more to improve the team and their standing, despite the number of players (without mentioning money, because that's contested) that came and went in such a short period of time, so too is it equally wrong to claim that he was an unmitigated disaster for Liverpool. As much hilarity as Liverpool often provided for United fans, it would be mendacious to pretend that there weren't points at which many of us genuinely feared that Liverpool were close to challenging our supremacy. Of course, part of the hilarity was caused precisely because of the improvement and then the eventual fall from grace, but it's only fair that we admit to that.
The main problem for Benitez, in my opinion, was that he did some things so well, but only rarely, in truth, that it magnified the failure to such an extent that it was hard to believe that it was the same team and manager in control of both. At times, the brilliance and the incompetence appeared within one week of each other, and for no apparent reason. And apart from the one season where Liverpool genuinely found the momentum to challenge for the league title, much of the rest of his five year spell, in the Premier League, specifically, was defined by poor results and performances against sides that Liverpool should have beaten, regardless of whether they were challenging for the league title. 5th and 7th place finishes for Liverpool in five seasons simply isn't good enough, and any excuses trotted out as reasons for that failure ring hollow, particularly when compared to how impressive Liverpool were either at certain points in each season, and in the Champions League, in general.
But I defy anyone to say that the way in which Liverpool more often than not set-up for European games was anything other than impressive, even if you didn't much appreciate the style (or lack thereof). I used to watch the games in Europe and think to myself that, while the football was hardly buccaneering, the position of each player in the defence and midfield would squeeze the opposition to the point where there were no easy options to anyone in advanced positions. That simply doesn't happen by accident, which is evidenced by the numerous scalps that Liverpool took during his time in charge against much better opposition on paper. And I have no doubt that it is something that our own manager learned from, particularly as our own improvement in Europe, and the change to a similarly pragmatic approach, came off the back of the arrivals of Benitez and Mourinho to this country.
All in all, then, I would suggest that what made Benitez so difficult to understand as a manager was that there was so little consistency to both his own and his teams performances. Awful and turgid defeats in the league, followed by fantastic performances in Europe, and then a genuine title challenge where Liverpool were by some distance better than United in the final part of the season, followed by one of their poorest seasons in living memory. But overall, it would be hard to argue that there wasn't a consistent, if not quite as uniform or spectacular as some would claim, improvement with time.
When you look at some of the candidates who have been linked with the position, I'd personally rather have Benitez in charge of United than many who have been mentioned. And that really highlights the dichotomy that many Liverpool fans have faced, because despite recognizing that Benitez had made numerous and spectacular blunders, when you genuinely assess who is available, it''s not entirely clear that any of them are actually that much more accomplished.

I think it's more likely they'll feature for our first team this season rather than go on loan. Players like Riera and Mascherano will leave, and we don't have money to replace them so the reserves will be brought in I reckon.
I thought Nemeth was meant to be the real deal? That's the impression i got from some of the comments in this thread, is he not all that?
check out some footage about himNah, you know what it's like, if a reserve/youth player has a couple of good games he's the next big thing, look at Macheda for example.
Nemeth could be a good player, i've heard he's lazy though.
Ahh right. To be fair to Macheda looks a class above when he plays for the reserves and he's got 3 goals for the first team in just a handful of appearances so maybe that was a bad example but i know exactly what you mean.Nah, you know what it's like, if a reserve/youth player has a couple of good games he's the next big thing, look at Macheda for example.
Nemeth could be a good player, i've heard he's lazy though.