But you are highlighting Sagna as a more recent example ok? but how does your argument work when Sagna over the last couple of seasons has been our most consistent/reliable player?
But now he is having an off season it is Arsenals fault that we have this player playing for our team against Man United? It's Arsenals fault that out of nowhere Sagna plays crap, after having very good seasons before?
Ok, I'm not singling out Sagna. It's more about the type of mistake we seem to be more prone to.
It's not entirely Arsenal's and Wenger's fault that he played so shit - to an extent, mind you! It's still up to the manager to gauge a player's hunger and willingness, and let's not forget he has a hungry talented youngster named Carl firing on all cylinders for the RB position.
This is where I hold exception, the same with Ramsey, if you are calling Ramsey not making one right pass in a match a huge mistake then every player on every team in the world will make those 'Huge mistakes' many times in a season.
And again I will say it, Ramsey isn't really in the team to set up goals, its Cazorla, Rosicky, the wide forwards like Walcott and Gervinho etc to do that. Ramsey is there to do a different job. Just because a player makes a wrong pass doesn't mean he is a nervous wreck also. I really don't see how you think he is either? I've seen Cazorla make many bad passes in an Arsenal shirt.
Like I said, I don't want to take anything away from Ramsey, but I'm only talking about crucial plays. I know Cazorla misplaced many passes and had an off day for his standards (although he was one of the few still making De Gea work).
The occasions when Ramsey is a fumbling nerve wreck are the crucial ones - he clearly gets nervous. He passes the ball just fine in the middle of the park, but when he has to pick out a wide open winger, he either makes the wrong decision or misplaces the pass (he did both against United, much to Walcott's despair).
Just to name a few recent examples, Ramsey missed 2 one-on-ones with the keeper against Fulham and WBA. When he should have been at least putting it on target.
You're saying it's not his job to set up goals or score, and I won't disagree. Then maybe he shouldn't go forward at all. Go tell this to Wenger - he wants total football, he is the one wanting players to do a bit of everything.
You see how you are overly understanding and forgiving with Ramsey's shortcomings but you're the first one to bash Arshavin when he can't defend? Ramsey is very ineffective at attacking play and Arshavin can't defend even if his life depends on it. Yet one is rewarded with regular first team football, while the other is ostracised from professional football.
That's why I'll say it again: I'd much rather have a team focusing on the strengths of specialists.
You said you can't imagine Man United making a mistake like the Arsenal one. Van Persie's mistake led to our goal. If he didn't make it, we wouldn't have scored that goal. It was to highlight that of course Man United make those mistakes and indeed in the same game that you are talking about.
Giggs did the same sort of thing not so long ago as well and they are the ones I can remember recently. There will be quite a few others from the start of the season where a Man United player loses concentration and it leads to a goal, or at least a goal scoring chance.
Hummels made a mistake in the game against Real Madrid. If I was to watch lots of world football I could probably list 100's of mistakes from very good footballers leading to penalties and goals etc
Are you insisting on this comparison really Bobby? You'd have to find another example of a United cock up - maybe ask beachryan or other supporters. But this one is not even close mate, RVP lost the ball in their offensive half and it still took a brilliant piece of interplay with Rosicky and Walcott finishing it from a controversial position.
I'm talking about monumental fuck ups. Sagna passed it inch perfect to RVP and tackled him inside the box! What else could he have done there? Maybe step up and take the penalty himself??
The Hummels example is much more in the same bracket, I agree. It was a horrible mistake but they were lucky enough to still batter Madrid 4-1.
The schoolboys thing wasn't the only thing I think you exaggerate on as you know we had a very long conversation not so long ago on how I think you exaggerate a lot.
Overall I think some of our players have concentration problems, Wenger has brought in a few crap players recently, he can be a bit harder on his team and players in certain situations etc
This would be a fair comment.
Our players have concentration problems, there is something fundamentally wrong with the way our team is being trained, when will we ever get experienced, ready made players playing for us? Wenger has a long track record of hampering/destroying promising players careers, Ramsey is a nervous wreck, when will Arsenal be ruthless?! Why don't Arsenal spend any money?! etc etc
These are exaggerations and this is just over the last few weeks in this thread. I'm not just talking about you Rentboy other people do it as well.
Some of the things people are saying have some merit, but people turn everything 'up to 11' and expand on things that just make everything a lot worse than they are.
As I have said before it just makes me frustrated seeing all of this said all of the time, especially when a result doesn't go the way we want it to go.
Well I do think Wenger has a different style and he is much more controlled than other managers. I'm sure Ferguson, for instance, would eat them alive - think of what he'd have done to Sagna? A mistake is a mistake, only human, but what if he noticed he was coasting through the match like he seemed to have done?
Sometimes I think some players are too comfortable under Wenger. It really shows.
The concentration and mentality issue you make jokes about is actually a crucial thing and it's costing us big time. That's exactly the point I wanted to discuss and I'm glad you brought it up.
Think about some of our big matches recently - that 2011 League Cup Final, us being knocked out of the CL by Milan in 2012 and Bayern in 2013.
These two Champions League ties illustrate better what I want to bring up.
Do you think it's normal for a team like Arsenal to get battered in those first legs like we did, only to make a spectacular comeback in the 2nd leg, falling agonisingly short of the mark? I for one think it's telling.
I think we can all agree this team is not playing as good as they can. Is Wenger taking the best out of his team?
I think there's a big psychological factor there allied to lack of concentration - the team bottles it when we have all to play for. And then when we are written off, we go in the 2nd leg and show what we can really do, when it's too little too late. Some people sum it up and say we lack 'winning mentality'. That isn't an inaccurate assumption IMO.
It's almost as if the team is afraid of winning something. It's very complex, but I do think there is something broken in the way the players are being coached. It's the only explanation for this collective mental frailty. I refuse to believe we signed a full group of players who all possessed these psychological barriers individually.
You make jokes about it, but I take it seriously.
Chamakh actually had quite a few games at the beginning of his Arsenal career and did well, then Van Persie came back and he couldn't handle it. Santos played quite a few games initially as well and didn't play too bad. Park is the only one that hasn't played really. But if you want to say they have had 30mins of football in an Arsenal shirt, then who am I to say you are exaggerating
Read my post again. I said
Park had about 30 minutes of football at Arsenal.
Chamakh was bad luck (although we never played to his strengths to be fair to him).
Andre Santos is a case of bad scouting. How could they expect him to endure the rigours of the Premiership as a left back? The guy is a known liability - even for Brazilian league standards, where the game is much less physical and defensive! That speaks volumes. Former Brazilian National team coach, Mano Menezes, had told the press that Andre Santos was a constant headache.
I can find the link to his interview, if it's translated, for you to see.
This is no exaggeration my friend.
And again every clubs scouting system gets duff buys and a lot of them, if every bodies scouting systems got the perfect players every time you would have 20 teams fighting for the League title come the end of may. But we have also bought Podolski, Giroud, Mertesacker, Koscielny, Cazorla, Arteta etc
Anyway you carry on as if our team is the worse run team in the world and act like we are struggling in the relegation zone, but the reality is we are 4th behind probably the biggest club in world football and two of the richest clubs in world football.
That is the reality, Arsenal and Arsene Wenger have made mistakes, but people are going waaaaaaaaaaaay over the top imo
I can say things in the heat of the moment when I'm angry after a bad result, many of us do. But I don't think I'm going over the top. I'm not ever saying Arsenal are a bad run club and I dare you to find a post by me saying it.
Having said that, is it very well run? Does it add up that we have a heavy wage bill for the quality of our squad? We can dig out some stats, I think it's been posted here before. Our wage bill is surprisingly expensive.
Are the quality of the players in our squad and the results on the pitch on par with the most expensive tickets in world football?
These are known facts and stats that we discussed here before over and over again. I don't feel like banging on this drum.
I don't concentrate only on bad things, but do you think it's normal that our scout system picks out youngsters who doesn't get to kick a ball for Arsenal? Those Brazilian kids that never got work permits and spend all their contract time on loan to 2nd division in Spain? Are we doing the best for their development if we intend to use them one day?
Look at the amount of deadwood we have - Denilson, Bendtner, Vela (who now is doing really well), Arshavin (who I back to perform well again when he joins another club), Park, Chamakh, Squilaci, Santos...
I'm no football business expert, but I have a genuine question: is it better to cut our losses and sell these guys or do we keep them in our books loaning them out and paying half of their wages?
When you look at how United dealt with their flops (such as Bebe) for instance.
So, do we really need to keep these guys occupying space in our books?
I don't know man, I'm not always with the brigade of fans who say 'spend, spend, spend' but here's a question for you: do you feel happy if your club is rich or successful?
Right now, after 8 years, I say well done for being a successful business and being one of 2 richest clubs in the world. But what's in it for the fans?