- Thread starter
- #10,051
It does feel more responsive on +2 but i feel the running speed is too fast, the players are too quick. I found a happy medium with +1.

It was too late. Had it happened earlier that would've been the case.why they don't just licence all italian stadiums as a countermeasure for loosing spanish ones?
it's just easy to tell "we lost spanish stadiums due to licencing". why you didn't bring some others that EA doesn't have under them???
Nothing to hide mate. No conspiracy theories here.Because "Gameplay is fundamental"..One company which repeat to the paroxysm this slogan, has certainly something to hide.
So, the gate is open..![]()
But I can because it's what really happened. It's not laziness. Creating stadiums is an effort and not as easy you think. Time, money, resources, legalities, you name it. If it was you'd see every club and national team stadium in the game. It did happen too late and there was hardly time to go for another package. Even EA don't have that many stadiums in, but I don't really know much about their engine and how easy/difficult it is to build using it.Placebo's reaction was about Konami's 'lazyness' (or lack of initiative).
I'm gonna give you an example. It's obvious that in PES 2014 they target South-America with the addition of both Argentinian and Chilean leagues licensed. The obvious thing to do would be to include lots of South-American stadiums (let's say 30). And please don't come with the argument that Konami knew very late in the development process that they didn't have the license to include other European stadiums. If that is the case they should fire some people in their legal department.
About Adam Bhatti. I personal have nothing against him. I also have the feeling that somepeople here have an unjust grudge against him. But this alone makes him a very bad community manager. The guy is too controversial within the PES community. Also look at how he acts sometimes. I am welll aware that the community can be very unreasonable at times ( no rain: i will cancel my preorder), but the big mistake is that he lets himself draw into discussion/polemics with some of these people. A good community manager doesn't defend his product by defending it too obviously. A good community manager knows when he has to stop reacting. Adam Bhatti is too personally involved (emotionally ???).
I hope this answers your questions.
Yeah thanks.
It is strange that some people in this thread simply don't want to see any criticism thrown towards Konami. Since PES 1 i bought every single PES game and this sometimes on playstation, Xbox, PSP and even Nintendo (for my kids). I'm a very good cutomer. I have some rights imho opinion.
Why do some assume that criticism isn't allowed? Surprised by this considering a big % of this thread is about criticism. The last 10-20 pages for example. Crazy rain talk. Everyone has a right to an opinion, it's just the way it is brought forward that's sometimes the issue; stating opinions as facts, being too aggressive, forcing your own opinion on people etc.
It is also absolutely ridiculius to blame EA for licensegate. Every good company would protect those licenses like crown jewels. In the PS2 era, Konami didn't need those licenses to attract millions of costumers....
Of course a company would protect what they have for business. And of course Konami didn't need licenses back then, but that doesn't take away the fact that millions of people choose to opt for another game solely for licenses. That's realism to them. They can't be bothered with all the editing. That's normal. The problem at hand though is the future of licensing. Because the stadium editor being gone due to some people not liking the fact fans create lifelike stadiums for free and share them about, this has opened a whole new world of locking out edit mode as a whole in the not so distant future. Being able to lockout editing based on reasons like company A throws tons of money on licensing only for fans freely able to create even better results using the free editor and share it totally defeats the purpose of licensing in the first place to them. They don't like it. Imagine a future with no edit mode as a result of this. Strictly licensed everything.
I have also the feeling (and that is my main criticism) that despite all the Adam Bhatti's in the world. Konami does not listen to the community. One example. If you have people reading internet forums, make the game much more customizable. Lots of people are fed up with the fake second divisions in the ML. The solution is very simple: give people the option to play ML without a second division and promotion and relevation. That way you don't even need a league mode (that is the reason why i personally have been playing more and more this mode).
Actually they do read. What I don't know is how they go about choosing. Don't have much to say here tbh.