• Major upgrades completed! Please report any issues you spot in here

Liverpool Thread

Re: Liverpool Thread(King Kenny!!)

Liverpool doing the right thing like i said before :)

Buying quality strikers :)

Correction.

Buying one potentially quality striker who needs to prove it in the big leagues, and also buying a dickhead with a ponytail for a ridiculous amount of money.

Whilst also getting rid of a genuinely world class striker to a rival team.
 
Re: Liverpool Thread(King Kenny!!)

Who had attitude problems and liable to get injured at any time.
 
Re: Liverpool Thread(King Kenny!!)

and who is happy clearly again.. what a ....

0,,10268~9383649,00.jpg
 
Re: Liverpool Thread(King Kenny!!)

Can't disagree with that even two months.
Not really. If any one of us had said that back then, we'd been shot down.

A bit like klashman was when he had the temerity to suggest your squad needed investment.

Hindsight's a wonderful thing.
 
Last edited:
Re: Liverpool Thread(King Kenny!!)

Oh right, so you think I'd have said he was Mr Happy and never been injured? Behave :LMAO:
 
Re: Liverpool Thread(King Kenny!!)

He loves only himself. He doing such thing after what he said about his love to Liverpool and about that he's not even close to play in any other english club. And he requesting transfer in last few days of winter window. But owners showed that they have guts, buying Carroll. Hope that players will show same guts in match against Chelsea.

As I said most players today are complete mercenaries caring only about their obscene pay packets.

Hence why I prefer international football.
 
Re: Liverpool Thread(King Kenny!!)

Another bit of news that hasn't been mentioned is that we've signed Conor Thomas on loan from Coventry, with a view to a permanent signing in the summer.

Highly rated 17 year old and expected to have a very good future. Our youth team just keeps getting better :)
 
Re: Liverpool Thread(King Kenny!!)

As I said most players today are complete mercenaries caring only about their obscene pay packets.

Hence why I prefer international football.

agree but there is also some similar things in international football as well...

hing: Quatar NT for example...
 
Re: Liverpool Thread(King Kenny!!)

Oh right, so you think I'd have said he was Mr Happy and never been injured? Behave :LMAO:
Maybe not but there probably would've been a backlash had one of us called him a moody crock. Along with the inevitable reassessment of opinions on him after he'd been sold.
 
Re: Liverpool Thread(King Kenny!!)

In this interview and also in yesterday first photos, he looks like he still can't believe whats just happening :D.
 
Re: Liverpool Thread(King Kenny!!)

another good view on the Carroll situation on wich i agree:

Then there are those who are comparing Carroll with David Villa. How can Villa be worth less than Carroll? I’ve heard Mike Parry and Stan Collymore ask this question and conclude that football is mad and that £35m for Carroll is wrong. Well Valencia were on the brink of bankruptcy and needed the money. That’s why they sold Villa, and why they only got £34.2m for him. He could pick and choose where he went and he wanted to go to Barcelona. If last summer Liverpool had offered more than Barca for Villa, he would still have gone to Barca.

The other thing is that Liverpool have sold El Ninny (26, 27 in March) for £50m, and brought in Suarez (24) and Carroll (22) with a net outlay of around £7-8m. These two new strikers could lead the Liverpool line for seven to eight years. It’s fantastic business for Liverpool. They’ve lost a striker who wasn’t doing it for them, and gained 2 strikers who might not work out, but all the evidence suggest they probably will.

People are saying Carroll has done nothing. Well how long do you need to judge Andy Carroll? Half a season is enough for me. Does he have to do it for years and years? He clearly has something very special that not many strikers have got. Only the Moose can’t see that.

Dalglish signed Alan Shearer in 1992 and he led Blackburn to the title. Shearer had had 3 seasons in Southampton’s first team. In 89-90 Shearer scored three goals in 26 games. In 90-91 it was four in 36. In 91-92 it was 13 in 41. But the British transfer record was smashed for Shearer when he signed for Blackburn at exactly the same age Carroll is signing for Liverpool. By the time he moved Shearer had appeared three times for England, Carroll so far once. In real terms it’s a ridiculous figure, but in football terms Dalglish knows exactly what he’s doing. He wouldn’t waste Liverpool’s money, and he had the chance to back out when Newcastle turned down £30m. He matched Newcastle’s valuation because he knows he’s signing the real deal.

Liverpool fans should trust Kenny, and those who think it’s crazy money should go and watch Michael Chopra and then tell me if they’d pay £35million for him.

Good points here, also like to throw into the hat that although the FSG did not dip into their own pockets too much, they obviuolsy sanctioned the move but the thing i like more than anything it that bar Chelsea paying 50M for El Ninny yesterday we have made a purchase which is more expensive than our nearest and dearest. A true statement if ever there was one.

Yes its a big fee and a bit of a risk but thats whats life is all about.
 
Re: Liverpool Thread(King Kenny!!)

good point but lighting dont strike twice 9/10. regardless 35m is too much for andy carroll and as said before its ruining our national team.

By that logic, how much you reckon wilshere is worth? probably close to 30m at least given by prices of british players.

i'd say wilshere has made a similar impact on the premiership this season as andy carroll. both men being touted has the future of the english side.

is wilshere worth 30+m? hell no IMO, same as andy carrolls price tag but you catch my drift right?

edit: what about walcott and aaron lennon? again i bet there would be priced around 30m too
 
Re: Liverpool Thread(King Kenny!!)

good point but lighting dont strike twice 9/10. regardless 35m is too much for andy carroll and as said before its ruining our national team.

By that logic, how much you reckon wilshere is worth? probably close to 30m at least given by prices of british players.

i'd say wilshere has made a similar impact on the premiership this season as andy carroll. both men being touted has the future of the english side.

is wilshere worth 30+m? hell no IMO, same as andy carrolls price tag but you catch my drift right?

edit: what about walcott and aaron lennon? again i bet there would be priced around 30m too

:DOH:
 
Re: Liverpool Thread(King Kenny!!)

What i've read in this thread has considerably broadened my horizon.
I'm sure now that i will never be a real football fan.
I'm much too critical.

To be honest IMO this transfer period was catastrophic for Liverpool (and maybe for football in general).

You lost one of the five best strikers in the world. What you got instead are two totally unproven players and one for a ridiculously high amount of money.

Yet all the Liverpool fans are happy like they haven't been for ages. I'm sure some people will not believe me when i say that i hope this turns out to be a good thing despite all obvious appearances.

I think all this climate of hope (and extreme naïvity) is due to the fact that Dalglish is at the helm.

Dags, tik, UJ and other Liverpool fans, please humour me and think about his.

What would you guys have said if all this had happened when Hodgson was still manager..would you guys have been that optimistic.

I'm sorry, but i really can't see what good things have happened.
But maybe i'm too cynical...
 
Re: Liverpool Thread(King Kenny!!)

i think someone has touched on a good point before

Even though Torres is a world class striker "on his day"

his heart was obviously no longer at Liverpool and you could tell the way he was playing, i wouldn't be suprised that recently when he started to give a shit again someone was interested in him or because of this Jan window

on the other the two strikers we gained regardless of the price tag we only paid £8 million for them both with the torres money

they will give us something different to what torres did. Any signing is a risk no one is proven in the premiership before they get there, even torres wasn't. we have made profit on him don't forget

the two new strikers will give us far more options and will also help the other people around them be more dangerous, time will tell on that one but i feel it is a positive mood

If this would of happened under Hodgson, i am not sure how i would of reacted to be honest as i do not trust him. I do trust Kenny
 
Re: Liverpool Thread(King Kenny!!)

Dalglish has a proven record of buying talent and building a team. Shearer has already been mentioned in here, perfect comparison and doesn't really need explaining anymore than that.

But if you want more, we've sold a player who is the worlds best striker when on top of his game. But that player hasn't been on top of his game for a while now, and is injury prone. This is the same player who was complaining about his body breaking down in the Premier League and that he fears for his health if he stays. On top of that, he clearly wasn't happy here and wanted to leave. So what would you expect us to do?

At the end of the day, as has been said enough times, no player is bigger than the club. If a player wants to leave, then let them. Regardless of who they are. We've sold big players before and were fine (if not better) afterwards. Rush was sold, Dalglish then created arguably the best Liverpool (or even English) team ever with the money from the sale.

This isn't Roy Hodgson, who would've had us go out and buy Zamora and Carlton Cole. Whilst also looking to spend £4m on another average left-back like Konchesky (who, with all due respect, is now playing for a Championship team) and £5m on Poulsen who's not really cut out for the Premier League at all.

So if you want to talk about paying over the odds and then Hodgson, there's your answer.

Berbatov was bought for £30m
Ferdinand for £30m
Robinho for £32m
Shevchenko for £30m
Veron for £28m

Those are just some examples, and of those how many did you think were worth the money at the time? At how did those transfers go? Because surely it can't be argued that the likes of Shevchenko and Robinho were anything close to being worth the money paid.

And you say about unproven players. Well, how much do you think those players would be worth once they'd "proven" themselves. How does Suarez "prove" himself if he's not given a chance in a top league? And let's say Carroll stays at Newcastle for the rest of the season and keeps up his ratio of games/goals so he has 20-odd goals at the end of the season. Then he stays next season and gets the same, or better. Has he "proven" himself then? I'd say at that point, Newcastle would want more than £35m for a player who would be 23 years old, with a "proven" record of scoring goals, and will be a regular England international.

Or, of course, we could just keep players around the club who don't want to play. We drop further down the table because we're forcing players to stay that don't want to be there. And we won't consider selling them because the "proven" talent out there costs far too much and we don't want to pay for players with huge potential because we don't want to take a risk.

Carroll won't be another Shevchenko, he's not going to leave on a free transfer. He's been signed while young and will still have resale value. If he doesn't do well, we'll sell him off and we'll likely still get £15m or more back even if he does really badly. That's the Moneyball aspect coming into it, to sign players with potential while young so that they still have value if you decide to sell. A huge cry from buying older players for a lot of money, who you can't sell for close to what you paid and might even leave for nothing. And yes, I'm talking about Poulsen and Konchesky there.
 
Re: Liverpool Thread(King Kenny!!)

on the other the two strikers we gained regardless of the price tag we only paid £8 million for them both with the torres money

£1.8m net spend as we also sold Babel. We've sold Torres who wanted to leave, had injury problems, didn't wan't to be at the club and hasn't really looked up for it for a while. We've sold Babel who was a massive shame as has clear skill but never succeeded so it was time for him to move on.

And for that, we've strengthened the team as a unit now. Instead of relying on one focal point of attack in Torres, we've now got a new dimension and will make defenders actually work a lot more rather than singling out Torres and nullifying us.

As you say, Torres wasn't proven. There was a lot of people saying we paid to much for him, lots of United fans in here questioning whether he was worth the money. He turned out decent enough I'd say, and we got back more than double what we paid for him. Decent business.
 
Re: Liverpool Thread(King Kenny!!)

@ Gerd,

It's a combination of factors.

Torres was leaving anyway
Most of us thought that Torres would leave in the summer anyway, so getting 50mil for a player that has been pretty poor and injured for a year is very good business. Admittedly I would rather he stayed and only have signed Suarez, but even then it would have been a 6 month gamble to see if he decided to stay or not. I think most of the irritation was down to the timing more than him actually leaving.

Investment
Instead of selling an asset and spending pennies on a replacement (Alonso - Aquilani? / Masch - Poulsen ) the money has been directly used to invest in the team with a little more thrown in. And might have been more if the other clubs would have been willing to sell (Adam/Young).

Potential
As for the players, both are risks, however they are both young and still developing. One has already done it on the world stage (although a good WC means nothing, it shows he has the potential and has done it in Holland which either means he will be great...or Kuyt) and the other has been pretty devastating in his first season at the top level. Also I don't think Carrol's succes has been down solely because of form, his strength, size and speed have been a very important part of his succes and he won't lose those with poor form. Even if Carrol turns out to be an only ok signing he will still command 20mil in a couple of years, as that's how ridiculous the market is for English players. The only way Liverpool will really lose money on him (besides injury) is if he ends up in jail...which is a possibility ;)

Tactics
We now have two potentially very dangerous strikers, Carrol has already been doing it in the Prem so needs to continue (and is less risk as a signing in that regard), Suarez needs to adjust to the game so needs time. However it means we have more players to score goals and tactically we have more options to play (effective long ball, on the floor, counter, etc) wheras with Torres the team was moulded to play to his strengths. Everybody has seen how much less effective he was with Hodgson's tactics, but also with Spain he has generally needed to be the main striker with the rest accomadating him. If he wasn't doing it, what has been the case since last season (for whatever reason) the team was poor and had no other options. It was pretty much Gerrard or Torres that you could rely on. Now, again potentially, we have added two players, with Meireles starting to look dangerous aswell. The team has become less reliant on one or two players and looks like it will be more balanced and more dangerous as a team.

Kenny
Also Kenny has gotten the team to play football again, and has a history of knowing his strikers. So the potential they have already shown and his/commoli's judgement to sign them gives more trust that it will work out.

Admittedly I don't think they will have the cutting edge of Torres in the biggest matches (CL, Top4) for atleast a few seasons, if ever, and that might very well be the difference. However the coming seasons we won't really be fighting in those matches anyway (and Utd have shown that you don't even need to be the best out of the top4 to win the league). By the time the team will have developed to fight again at that level Torres will be 30 anyway. And to have to rely on him for every attack is a dangerous path to take, which has been shown the past 18 months.

New signings are always a risk, but quite a lot of aspects point towards a positive outcome. So we will see.

There was also an interesting comparison made somewhere else, If Torres had been sold for 40mil in the summer and Carrol/Suarez would have cost 15/25mil would there have been as much a commotion made about it?
 
Last edited:
Re: Liverpool Thread(King Kenny!!)

Well i must admit that i've read a couple of pretty good arguments.
I agree most with tik, if i would have been Liverpool (and fortunately i'm not) i would have considered the rest of this season and would never have bought Caroll for that amount of money.
To me he seemed a fairly average striker, i think a player like Bent is vastly superior and would have been a better option (but the amount of money that Villa payed for Bent is also ridiculously high). But considering Caroll, yes he might turn out to be a new Shearer, from what i've seen from him that is the striker he reminds me most of (and that is not a bad role model, Shearer was a very good striker). I just hope the amount of money and all the inevitable fuss the media will make of it could well a disadvantage for Caroll. A yong player can do without all this attention.
 
Re: Liverpool Thread(King Kenny!!)

Bent FAR superior?! Yeah he scores goals but he's a bit of a carthorse and not a great all round player. Bent has been around years and goal return is admittedly very good but Carroll will fit in better with the style I believe Liverpool will now play. Judge the kid in a few years and then you can say Bent is far superior if need be. Carroll might actually end up surprising you all and Kenny is building and getting in young guys to play for team for years to come.

Well i must admit that i've read a couple of pretty good arguments.
I agree most with tik, if i would have been Liverpool (and fortunately i'm not) i would have considered the rest of this season and would never have bought Caroll for that amount of money.
To me he seemed a fairly average striker, i think a player like Bent is vastly superior and would have been a better option (but the amount of money that Villa payed for Bent is also ridiculously high). But considering Caroll, yes he might turn out to be a new Shearer, from what i've seen from him that is the striker he reminds me most of (and that is not a bad role model, Shearer was a very good striker). I just hope the amount of money and all the inevitable fuss the media will make of it could well a disadvantage for Caroll. A yong player can do without all this attention.
 
Back
Top Bottom