lo zio
International
- 24 October 2005
- Palermo
i agree with u about didì, mate
talking about pazzini, u're right. his play isn't toni's play. they're very different, but also fiorentina gameplay changed a lot last year.... let me explain. i realized fiorentina was going to sell luca, when i noticed fiorentina changed their gamplay, last year. until 2 years ago the whole team used "to play for luca"... long crosses, jorgensen's cuts inside... every move of prandelli was thought to help luca to unleash his strenght. last year, with mutu, fiorentina became a new team... they started playing FOOTBALL, luca became just one piece (a great piece) of a big puzzle. Pazzini perfectly fits fiorentina gameplay now.... imo is even better than luca for fiorentina football nowadays. (coz his ability in the box perfectly fits mutu's assisting ability "out of the box").
of course without toni they will loose a lot talking about centimeters and headings.... but how many goals luca scored by headings this season? almost 1\2 of the previous year.
A tare could be useful..... but if they put tare in somebody has to go out.... mutu??? pazzini??? it's important to have a tall striker (it's very important), but when u have pazzini and mutu... u have to line up pazzini and mutu....... (unless u have toni too :mrgreen: ).
diego della valle spent a lot of money on pazzini 3 years ago...(that bastard...... he was "almost" a palermo player those days!:-x ). Now they have to justify that decision by putting him in the starting 11 imo.... and pazzini too has to justify his choice by playing....
here in italy we've got plenty of young talented strikers (not as good as pazzo, btw) who don't play.... thay just warm the bench coz of their coaches weakness (just consider what bianchi did this season, when he finally got the chance to show his real potential)... thank God Prandelli is not weak.. he told that pazzo is a perfect mixture of power, quality, and ability in the box, and he will become one of the best european strikers...... and honestly i feel the same.
EDIT: of course i do know that having a tall striker is not just about scoring a couple of goals by heading per year.... it means having the possibility to let "breathe" the midfield, avoiding the midfielders being under pressure for too much, it means having the possibility to reach the box with long passes, when the game it's almost over and the players are too tired to play with the ball on the ground.
i know it's really hard to play without a tall striker (here in italy we call those kind of fwds "torri", wich means "towers"), but if u already have a "pazzini" in your team, then "the game is worth the candle"
u're absolutely right about amauri, mate. he's great, but he's not unique. there are others strikers in europe (not so many btw imo ) good as him...... but would they come to palermo? :roll: i mean, we were lucky with amauri too. our (great) general manager Rino Foschi was sure he was going to become a crack.. but a lot of clubs already noticed him (barca and fiorentina most of all). but they weren't so confident in his potential, and that's the reason why we could get him.... if he would have done at chievo what he did last year in palermo, i'm pretty sure amauri would be a barca or fiorentina player today.
so, even if he's replaceble..... he still remains a very big factor for us.... coz his "replacement" would be unreachable for palermo.
true... those guys are really something special. Suddenly barzagli will leave... he's just too good to stay in palermo, he deserve the best scenario europe can offer, he deserve to play in champions league.
But at least Fabio will stay with us \\:o/ \\:o/ \\:o/
sorry juve fans for this big off topic :roll:
talking about pazzini, u're right. his play isn't toni's play. they're very different, but also fiorentina gameplay changed a lot last year.... let me explain. i realized fiorentina was going to sell luca, when i noticed fiorentina changed their gamplay, last year. until 2 years ago the whole team used "to play for luca"... long crosses, jorgensen's cuts inside... every move of prandelli was thought to help luca to unleash his strenght. last year, with mutu, fiorentina became a new team... they started playing FOOTBALL, luca became just one piece (a great piece) of a big puzzle. Pazzini perfectly fits fiorentina gameplay now.... imo is even better than luca for fiorentina football nowadays. (coz his ability in the box perfectly fits mutu's assisting ability "out of the box").
of course without toni they will loose a lot talking about centimeters and headings.... but how many goals luca scored by headings this season? almost 1\2 of the previous year.
A tare could be useful..... but if they put tare in somebody has to go out.... mutu??? pazzini??? it's important to have a tall striker (it's very important), but when u have pazzini and mutu... u have to line up pazzini and mutu....... (unless u have toni too :mrgreen: ).
diego della valle spent a lot of money on pazzini 3 years ago...(that bastard...... he was "almost" a palermo player those days!:-x ). Now they have to justify that decision by putting him in the starting 11 imo.... and pazzini too has to justify his choice by playing....
here in italy we've got plenty of young talented strikers (not as good as pazzo, btw) who don't play.... thay just warm the bench coz of their coaches weakness (just consider what bianchi did this season, when he finally got the chance to show his real potential)... thank God Prandelli is not weak.. he told that pazzo is a perfect mixture of power, quality, and ability in the box, and he will become one of the best european strikers...... and honestly i feel the same.
EDIT: of course i do know that having a tall striker is not just about scoring a couple of goals by heading per year.... it means having the possibility to let "breathe" the midfield, avoiding the midfielders being under pressure for too much, it means having the possibility to reach the box with long passes, when the game it's almost over and the players are too tired to play with the ball on the ground.
i know it's really hard to play without a tall striker (here in italy we call those kind of fwds "torri", wich means "towers"), but if u already have a "pazzini" in your team, then "the game is worth the candle"
u're absolutely right about amauri, mate. he's great, but he's not unique. there are others strikers in europe (not so many btw imo ) good as him...... but would they come to palermo? :roll: i mean, we were lucky with amauri too. our (great) general manager Rino Foschi was sure he was going to become a crack.. but a lot of clubs already noticed him (barca and fiorentina most of all). but they weren't so confident in his potential, and that's the reason why we could get him.... if he would have done at chievo what he did last year in palermo, i'm pretty sure amauri would be a barca or fiorentina player today.
so, even if he's replaceble..... he still remains a very big factor for us.... coz his "replacement" would be unreachable for palermo.
I would be a LOT sadder to see someone like Barzagli or Fabio Simplicio leave because for me, they're a lot less replacable.
true... those guys are really something special. Suddenly barzagli will leave... he's just too good to stay in palermo, he deserve the best scenario europe can offer, he deserve to play in champions league.
But at least Fabio will stay with us \\:o/ \\:o/ \\:o/
sorry juve fans for this big off topic :roll:
Last edited: