- Thread starter
- #2,461
gerd
Retired Footballer
Your post is the best proof that all this is very subjective, abou.
I'm pretty sure most horror tackles (when the ball is involved) are more clumsyness than bad intent.
What was Rooney trying to do against Wigan ? Can there be any other answer than deliberately hurting the Wigan player ? If so, please give me a couple of possibilities....the ball was at least 20 metres away...at least. Why did he do that ? Was it related to the ball ? I don't think so.
It is also very interesting that you talk about the WItsel-Wasilewski incident. WIth all respect, but you don't know 10% of what happened there. You know why Witsel made that horror tackle (and the result is an horror tackle, there is no doubt about that) ? Because he was terrified of Wasilewski. The victim Wasilewski terrorrised Belgian football pitches for years when that happened. In the weeks before that match, he had broken several noses using his elbows...that guy was the butcher of Belgian football and is now known as a victim...that must be one of the biggest jokes in Belgian football (of course i'm exagerating). Witsel and Standard had the grace not to mention that young Witsel was terrified the whole of the match before the incident. At the time Standard had a fantastic team: Dante, Fellaini, Witsel, Jovanovic, Defour, Mbokani and others. They finally succeeded in winning the Jupiler League, but the matches against Anderlecht were very, very violent...they were all about intimidation...inexperienced young Witsel lost it....I'm not saying he didn't made a mistake, he fully dserved the ban het got and certainly should have had more, people who only saw the horrific images don't know half of the story...
After that incident Wasilewski calmed down a litle bit, but he was still one of the most violent players...now he is playing for Leicester, i wonder how he is doing. He was idolized by Anderlecht fans, some of them even go to matches of Leicester...but all the non Anderlecht Belgian fans absolutely hated him...this man never was a victim.
And by the way, i don't read any convincing argument in your last post. The fact that the ball is involved or not is essential. Football is all about having possession of the ball.
Why foul a player when the ball is nowhere near ?
Look at the absolutely bonkers penalty Yanga mbiwa got for what he did to Eto'o. To me that was a clear cut penalty...ther ewas no need to do that.
Now about Rooney against Wigan. Was that a foul like Yanga Mbiwa's ? Not at all, that was an assault with the ball nowhere near. The starting point of this discussion was what Yaya Touré did with Van Wolfswinkel. I think 95% of the non Manchester City fans will agree that he should have been banned, if you know that both Caroll and Bellamy got bans for similar "fouls"...
What Rooney did was much more violent and futher away from the ball.
This said, Rooney is a fantastic player who deserves to be a hero for United fans. He is an unselfish team player, but that time he made a big mistake and came away with it, unlike Witsel who made a mistake...
I'm pretty sure most horror tackles (when the ball is involved) are more clumsyness than bad intent.
What was Rooney trying to do against Wigan ? Can there be any other answer than deliberately hurting the Wigan player ? If so, please give me a couple of possibilities....the ball was at least 20 metres away...at least. Why did he do that ? Was it related to the ball ? I don't think so.
It is also very interesting that you talk about the WItsel-Wasilewski incident. WIth all respect, but you don't know 10% of what happened there. You know why Witsel made that horror tackle (and the result is an horror tackle, there is no doubt about that) ? Because he was terrified of Wasilewski. The victim Wasilewski terrorrised Belgian football pitches for years when that happened. In the weeks before that match, he had broken several noses using his elbows...that guy was the butcher of Belgian football and is now known as a victim...that must be one of the biggest jokes in Belgian football (of course i'm exagerating). Witsel and Standard had the grace not to mention that young Witsel was terrified the whole of the match before the incident. At the time Standard had a fantastic team: Dante, Fellaini, Witsel, Jovanovic, Defour, Mbokani and others. They finally succeeded in winning the Jupiler League, but the matches against Anderlecht were very, very violent...they were all about intimidation...inexperienced young Witsel lost it....I'm not saying he didn't made a mistake, he fully dserved the ban het got and certainly should have had more, people who only saw the horrific images don't know half of the story...
After that incident Wasilewski calmed down a litle bit, but he was still one of the most violent players...now he is playing for Leicester, i wonder how he is doing. He was idolized by Anderlecht fans, some of them even go to matches of Leicester...but all the non Anderlecht Belgian fans absolutely hated him...this man never was a victim.
And by the way, i don't read any convincing argument in your last post. The fact that the ball is involved or not is essential. Football is all about having possession of the ball.
Why foul a player when the ball is nowhere near ?
Look at the absolutely bonkers penalty Yanga mbiwa got for what he did to Eto'o. To me that was a clear cut penalty...ther ewas no need to do that.
Now about Rooney against Wigan. Was that a foul like Yanga Mbiwa's ? Not at all, that was an assault with the ball nowhere near. The starting point of this discussion was what Yaya Touré did with Van Wolfswinkel. I think 95% of the non Manchester City fans will agree that he should have been banned, if you know that both Caroll and Bellamy got bans for similar "fouls"...
What Rooney did was much more violent and futher away from the ball.
This said, Rooney is a fantastic player who deserves to be a hero for United fans. He is an unselfish team player, but that time he made a big mistake and came away with it, unlike Witsel who made a mistake...