The very last sentence is most important. He'll most likely miss the upcoming season entirely, though, which is a shame.
And that's how I understood it.
"Unreliable" was indeed a harsh word to use to describe how I interpreted your (very slight) criticism about Hummels. I basically meant to say that I agree about Hummels' blunder-quota being higher than Badstuber's. Both player's have their strengths and weaknesses, of course. Hummels has the slight advantage, in my opinion.
anyway, what i'm trying to say is that i didn't mean to diminish hummels value. on the contrary, i meant to highlight badstuber value (whose qualities might appear less evident, as kanoute's post suggested), by mentioning hummels (infrequent) blunders.
And that's how I understood it.
"Unreliable" was indeed a harsh word to use to describe how I interpreted your (very slight) criticism about Hummels. I basically meant to say that I agree about Hummels' blunder-quota being higher than Badstuber's. Both player's have their strengths and weaknesses, of course. Hummels has the slight advantage, in my opinion.