Rantboy
International
- 27 December 2002
- Fluminense FC / Arsenal
Damn it, nevermind 4th place, I fear we won't make even the Europa League. Just took a look at the table after this round and we're 7th!!...
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature currently requires accessing the site using the built-in Safari browser.
Maybe it would be better for Arsene if he left...i don't think he deserves this.
It is always very easy to predict catastrophes, when the results are not according to the expectations you can claim they are catastrophical and when they are good nobody will remember your catastrophic predictions.
Some fans in here sound as if Arsenal has a divine right to be among the best teams in the world...football clubs go through ebb and flow like each one of us...moaning about so-called bad results (if Van Persie doesn't hit the woodwork twice, Arsenal can win this match...oh and considering the fact that Liverpool lost against this Bolton team, this is even a good result) is the easy way out.
Did we go backwards when we offloaded Graham and Rioch and replaced with wenger?Do you think that Arsenal would not go backwards without Wenger?
Do you think that things will get better with a new manager? There are scientific studies that have done research about the impact of new managers. The result: the impact is nil, nada, nothing...
When i read your post i think that for you Arsenal has the divine right to be in the top 4. Football clubs go in cycles upwards and downwards, Arsenal could be in a downwards cycle (but last year around this time they were competing for the title, don't forget that).
I know what you will reply jonney: last year we were competing for the title, but we failed...
Ok, so what?
Your expectations are not realistic and you project this on Wenger...once Arsenal took the decision to build and pay a new stadium, you bloody well knew that financially they could not compete with the big clubs. Hence: out of the top four. That is very logical. Don't blame Wenger for this...you got to blame your board who ultimately took that decision.
You can't compare Wenger with Mourinho, AVB and Dalglish. Although i agree with you that AVB and Mourinho should not get stick. Dalglish should get more stick...he has bought the worst CF in the history of English football for an amount that is ridiculously high and his team attacks without a plan. Apart from Caroll Liverpool have very good players but they are boring as hell...
As for Arsenal: you get the quality for the amount of money you are able to spend. Wenger invested in young relatively cheap players...the fact that he overachieved in the past (although with more money) is haunting him now.
That is my opinion, i know you don't agree and i also know that not a single argument will persuade you that Wenger shouldn't go. So let's just agree to disagree with all possible respect.
Did we go backwards when we offloaded Graham and Rioch and replaced with wenger?
Did city go backwards offloading mark hughes for Manchini? Has RM gone backwards since getting Morinho? list goes on and on.
my point is no, some times you go forward when you have a new manager with fresh new ideas. Whos to say our next manager wont bring us forward?
You have not answered my question as to what it will take for you to decide that wenger has to go. finishing 7th? what is it?
So whos to blame when we dotn have a Plan B or how our defenders cant do basic defending? The board? LOL come on mate. i have given u plenty of reason in the past on why wenger has to go that doesnt even mention the fact we aint won nothing.
i have challenged you to explain who is responsible for coaching our players to defend properly. who is responsible for developing a plan B when Plan A of walking the ball at the back of the net doesnt work. Or who decides who is playing each match.
The board are to blame? What does wenger have responsibility for then if he is not responsible for on-field actions then? Who?
All you point to, is "lack of silverware" as the reason why i want wenge rout when clearly i have named LOADS of different reasons why he should go yet time and time again you ignore it and focus on just one issue: lack of silverware.
Lets see if you can respond to the other issues mate
In terms of transfers maybe you are right but how come dispite making a few godo defenders such has toure, vermahlen and sagna, how come they all still cant defend as a unit?Wenger has to go at the moment that he can't have the results that are appropriate with the players he has.
With this team it would be a miracle if he finished in the top four.
Arsenal under Wenger are to my knowledge the only team that never bought stars, but made them...name me one star Wenger has bought?
Henry? Nope, he looked finished after his misadventure in Italy.
Bergkamp? Nope, same as Henry.
Fabregas? Youth player
Viera? An unknown player.
Overmars and Kanu come close, but they weren't exactly stars when brought.
Pires? Nope.
Wenger made al those players better.
The current crop are significantly less good, but still some of them are getting better and better under him (Sagna, Song).
Wenger made some bad transfers? Yes.
Ask 10 people who is the best manager around and at least five will say Ferguson. Ok: Forlan, Djemba Djemba, Barthez (and quite a few other Gk's), Owen, and loads of other players.
Transferring players is always gambling a litle bit...
Why do Arsenal players can't defend (you exagerate, but i go along with you)? Because they haven't got a single top defender in years...not a single...There is one particular Arsenal defender i know quite well, Thomas Vermaelen. Well if you compare the current Thomas Vermaelen to the Ajax Vermaelen, this player is much, much better...Wenger made him better. I'm quite sure the same goes for Sagna and Clichy (look how well he is doing for City now).
You are a nice bloke jonney but with you the glass is always half empty. Discussing with you sometimes has similarities with trying to catch water...there is no harm in that, but please forgive if for the moment i've had enough of it...absolutely no disrespect.
Maybe you are just to big a fan to see things rationally.
Ihave to agree with jonney!!
And i think that Wenger should work more with youth players rather than being a manager!!He lack tactical knowledge and mainly becouse of that we lose many games!!
Wenger has to go at the moment that he can't have the results that are appropriate with the players he has.
With this team it would be a miracle if he finished in the top four.
Arsenal under Wenger are to my knowledge the only team that never bought stars, but made them...name me one star Wenger has bought?
Henry? Nope, he looked finished after his misadventure in Italy.
Bergkamp? Nope, same as Henry.
Fabregas? Youth player
Viera? An unknown player.
Overmars and Kanu come close, but they weren't exactly stars when brought.
Pires? Nope.
Wenger made al those players better.
The current crop are significantly less good, but still some of them are getting better and better under him (Sagna, Song).
Wenger made some bad transfers? Yes.
Ask 10 people who is the best manager around and at least five will say Ferguson. Ok: Forlan, Djemba Djemba, Barthez (and quite a few other Gk's), Owen, and loads of other players.
Transferring players is always gambling a litle bit...
Why do Arsenal players can't defend (you exagerate, but i go along with you)? Because they haven't got a single top defender in years...not a single...There is one particular Arsenal defender i know quite well, Thomas Vermaelen. Well if you compare the current Thomas Vermaelen to the Ajax Vermaelen, this player is much, much better...Wenger made him better. I'm quite sure the same goes for Sagna and Clichy (look how well he is doing for City now).
You are a nice bloke jonney but with you the glass is always half empty. Discussing with you sometimes has similarities with trying to catch water...there is no harm in that, but please forgive if for the moment i've had enough of it...absolutely no disrespect.
Maybe you are just to big a fan to see things rationally.
so how do u explain the early years when we done so well under him?
He was tactically neive then?
I explain that at that time our players were more experienced!
Now we have many young players with very good technical ability but not tactical!!With some exeptions!!
so how do u explain the early years when we done so well under him?
He was tactically neive then?
We have the weakest squad in the Wenger Era. There's no point in comparing one by one, I won't even go there!
To make matters worse, we aren't making the best out of what we've got. Far from it!
Wenger insists in this suspicious 4-3-3 formation. Makes our already vulnerable flanks look even worse, especially at times when we have makeshift fullbacks.
Arshavin came as world beater to this club, but after being played out of position for more than 3 seasons has lost his way.
Many seasons ago we had plenty of attacking power that imposed some respect from opposition.
Today we got guys like Walcott, who will be an eternal promise and can't finish chances even if his life depends on it.
Say whatever you want about Arshavin, I know he is a four letter word right now among Arsenal fans, but I doubt he would miss that sitter yesterday. Just play him behind RVP in a 4-4-2 and we would see him score more, create chances for RVP and not being exposed with his piss poor defending.
Then if he doesn't respond even then, yeah, ship him back to Russia. But at least give the guy a chance, because a chump like Walcott drives me up the walls, I can't watch anymore!
wenger inherent the famous back 4 and the likes of pires viera helb petit etc all could pass like xavi and co to an extent whilst our current crop can't play that tippy tappy shit anymore
Sent from my Galaxy Nexus using Tapatalk
Jonney, you should download the latest edition of Football Weekly, the Gurdian's football podcast. A large part of it is about Arsenal's problems. Wenger isn't mentioned at all (only in terms of: "will he stay", and yes he will).
Basically they say Kronke is to blame, because American club owner have other standards of success. Kronke is a very succesfull owner by American standards: his teams make huge profits. The fact that they lack success in term of sports results does not disturb Kronke. Apparently Arsenal is doing rather well financially, but the base is small and Kronke has to be cautious. Result: he refuses to invest in the team...But you should listen to the podcast, they explain it much better.
But basically they said what i've been saying: if you don't invest enough the results will go downhill. Wenger may have made mistakes, but these have minor influence...
The players simply are not good enough because you have to pay a price for good players, Kronke isn't prepared to pay that amount of money and Wenger gets the stick from the fans.
Conclusion: fans are targeting the wrong person, as long as they target Wenger, Kronke will not change his ways and things will continue to go downhill. (That is my conclusion). One could ask if fans can influence Kronke, of course...