I'm not looking for reasons to dislike this game as much as it may seem like i am doing so but the following is the snippet from metacritic of the guardian's review.
'Ever since it first worked out how to assemble pixels so that they resembled something more recognisable than aliens, the games industry has dreamed of creating one thing above all else – a game that is indistinguishable from a film, except that you can control the lead character. With LA Noire, it just might, finally, have found the embodiment of that particular holy grail.'
All i have to say is that i pointed out in a previous post that if reviews were going to rate this game on it's technical merits rather than the joy of the gameplay then i would have to take these reviews with a pinch of salt. Most of the actual review follows along the same line as the snippet. 5/5 undoubtedly for technicality but what about for fun and enjoyment?
I'm not implying it needs to be 'action-packed' to be fun and enjoyable, some of my favourite games are adventure games like Monkey Island and Broken Sword, but this review leaves a lot to be desired by way of understanding just what the game actually is. If i were to guess then i'd go for big-interactive movie, in the same style as Heavy Rain, over the aformentioned point and click adventure game.
Sometimes i think that there are specific games that are too innovative to rate badly in a review but end up not being not as good in reality as they are on paper. GTA IV was one of these games for me. Forgive my cynicism of LA Noire here but it's built on a pre-established beliefs of the flaws of game reviews rather than an irrational dislike for a game i've never played and know nothing about.