• Push notifications have been temporarily disabled as they were causing issues with timeouts. We'll look at restoring them once the rest of our pending updates/upgrades have been completed over the coming days.

FIFA World Cup Brasil 2014

Let's put it this way: if he wants to play again, he just needs his teeth ripped off. One by one. Without anesthaetic of any kind.

I've had several teeth removed, four in fact. The last two was without anesthatics and it was less painful than with. OK, the actual extraction was a tiny bit more painful but then it was fine. With anesthaetics the pain that comes when the drugs wear off is next to unbearable.

If Suarez isn't banned for life he should be forced to play with THIS!

lecter_mask.jpg
 
so what will colombia do now? if ivory coast don't win their game, colombia are the group leader in all cases. if ivory coast win and colombia lose by some large margin, they have a chance to avoid uruguay and draw costa rica. hmmm...
 
surely Suarez needs to be banned for the rest of the World cup and the first 38 games of next season for his club.

The guy is just crazy!
 
Wait? So, you actually still want him to play for you?
Besides, a ban is a "punishment" meant for the player only. The team being handicapped by the loss of that player is only a secondary effect of that punishment, not its main purpose.
 
why should LFC be punished for what he did in international duty?

The punishment is for Suarez and the fact after everything, he still can't be trusted not to bite players on a football pitch.

He shouldn't be allowed back on a football pitch until he has had at least a years Psychological assessment and a certficate at the end of it from qualified professional stating that he poses no danger to other players.

He is obviously mental, why should other players whether it be in international duty or in the premier league risk being assaulted every time they go onto the pitch with him?

Liverpool knew what they were buying into and when they extended his contract.
 
wow wow you guys are over reacting here , I wish he have biten Chiellini's ear , he's as prick as Suarez just more polite.

Suarez should be banned from playing for Uruguay, this has to do nothing with Liverpool, hope now Barca and Real doesn't have interes on signing him and he remain at LFC, he's very important player for us.
 
A 20 game ban (what he should have got the last time) is the minimum he should receive

He won't get that tho because FIFA weren't involved in his previous bans and so will act like it's his first offense.
 
He did not kicked them out.
First Ghana could have just scored the penalty in overtime and still had chances in penalty shootout.
It was a simple handball on the goal line.
Happens sometimes, ends up in penalty and a red card like in 2010.
It was just more in focus, because it was in the last Minute and Uruguay went through.
From suarez / Uruguays point of view it was the right decission to take the ban and penalty instead of the goal.

Let me put it differently then: He clearly broke the rules and showed his great lack of sportsmanship. Plus his celebration afterwards made him my personal person of empathy in world football.
 
Let me put it differently then: He clearly broke the rules and showed his great lack of sportsmanship. Plus his celebration afterwards made him my personal person of empathy in world football.

Yeah, i admit.
I like his skills and the way he plays, but everything besides is a shame.
 
I can't believe people still talk about that penalty vs Ghana? what he did was right thing to do , I'll do that for my country all day long , he did penalty it was given also red card just by rules and chicks still crying about that? (biting its an other thing tho)
 
why should LFC be punished for what he did in international duty?

If you really think that argument is good, let's try it elsewhere.

Say he tested positive for EPO, do you really think the ban should only apply for the national team?
 
Wait? So, you actually still want him to play for you?
Besides, a ban is a "punishment" meant for the player only. The team being handicapped by the loss of that player is only a secondary effect of that punishment, not its main purpose.

well, he is our top scorer, i want him to have bigest price possible and help the team in CL..LFC as institution should not be punished for his national team actions, after all he´s their player who´s just on "loan" to NT... he scores goals and creates revenue for LFC... of course i want him to play for us and score goals.. that´s what he does best.
 
Suarez is one of the stars of the world cup = no punishment by FIFA.

Ever the optimist? :)

Is that karl Pilkington in your avatar by the way?

LFC as institution should not be punished for his national team actions, after all he´s their player who´s just on "loan" to NT.

I'm starting to question your rational thought pattern to be honest. LFC could (and should) sue Suarez for his last dime.
 
Last edited:
If you really think that argument is good, let's try it elsewhere.

Say he tested positive for EPO, do you really think the ban should only apply for the national team?

well of course?! when was the last time a national assotiation has payed money to clubs in case the player got injured in the national matches and wasn´t avileable to perform for their clubs?

when a player is out of the club duty, the club has no power over his actions... how should they? the player is member of NT assotiation that should punish or ban him in terms of their assotiation games etc... it wasn´t a Premier League match he did the action, the PL has nothing to do with it.

i agree on the point that LFC should punish Suarez, he´s their employee after all.
 
Suarez is one of the stars of the world cup = no punishment by FIFA.

This seems likely.

Inconclusive evidence methinks.

If the Uruguayan manager had a pair he'd send the little rat home. He doesn't. They practically applaud Suarez's antics there.

Edit: From Chiellini himself: "Suarez is a sneak and he gets away with it because FIFA want their stars to play in the WC. I'd love to see if they hvae the courage to use video evidence against him. The referee saw the bite mark too, but he did nothing about it."
 
Last edited:
Greece, ivorycoast and Japan do not deserve to go through.
Really bad football shown by these teams this world cup.
Unfortunately an opponent for Costa Rica needs to be found... ;):D;)
 
well of course?! when was the last time a national assotiation has payed money to clubs in case the player got injured in the national matches and wasn´t avileable to perform for their clubs?

when a player is out of the club duty, the club has no power over his actions... how should they? the player is member of NT assotiation that should punish or ban him in terms of their assotiation games etc... it wasn´t a Premier League match he did the action, the PL has nothing to do with it.

Please, you're not that dumb. Don't insult yourself. Liverpool is now the proud owner for what should be considered worthless resource. The first club that feature him in their lineup tells the world that they have no morale.
 
Last edited:
Class:

Alexander Büttner @ A_Buttner28 30m
Another positive that comes with my move
to Moscow is that now I have a lower
chance of getting bitten by Suarez
 
Is it fuck.

Try James Richardson, one of the finest football TV presenters you'll find anywhere. Famous for presenting British Channel 4's Football Italia back in the 90s when Serie A was top dog.

LOL ok... I don't believe you :P

hqdefault.jpg



@Pipa
FIFA is legislated to ban a player from all professional football by the way. They did with Tassotti in 1994 afaik.
 
Last edited:
Back
Top Bottom