Nope:I’m so glad you have pointed this out it really irks me. In FIFA 20 Spurs GK kit is exactly the same colour as their 3rd kit.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature currently requires accessing the site using the built-in Safari browser.
Nope:I’m so glad you have pointed this out it really irks me. In FIFA 20 Spurs GK kit is exactly the same colour as their 3rd kit.
My mistake. It must because I played so much PES 2020 and the option file I had Lloris wore his light blue kit!Nope:
Like I said, these people are their own worst enemies and they don't even realize it. They don't want variation in execution because the emphasis is on "competitive play." In their eyes, you can't have competitive play if random variables are involved. Unfortunately, they tend to forget they're playing a game that's supposed to mimic a real sport to some degree. This isn't League of Legends. It's a win at all costs mentality mixed with dare I say, a complete lack of understanding of the football.
Anyone with sense can see that he clearly overpowered the cross. It's hit at what, 80%+ bar? That's what happens. Do they really want their hand held to the degree of, "push square for perfect cross." If you overhit it, you overhit it. Would they demand an underhit shot that trickles towards the keeper to be a goal just because they hit the shot button? It's ridiculous.
Yeah, timed finishing is a perfect example of what I mean. Take something that should depend on many contextual factors like you outline and dumb it down to only needing "leet gamer skills" to "widen the skill gap".This is where new features like "timed finishing" come in. Hit the button when the bar is green and your shot will be more accurate. Body position? Weak/Strong foot? Angle? Pressure? Defender in the way? Oh, never mind any of that nonsense.
1. Take away skill relating to the sport itself (even people who know nothing should be able to "compete" and buy fifa points!)
2. Replace it with something that everyone understands
You know have a garbage game that feels nothing like football but it's also making you more money!
From what I've read, you "rank up" your stadium in FUT as you get better, so when you're playing against a good player, they'll have earnt a bigger stadium than yours. You don't buy the stadium "card" you want (or get it in a pack) any more.More Customization
Stadium Creator ...
View attachment 53210
"In FIFA Ultimate Team, players can make their FUT Club truly unique with a range of new and expanded ways to customise the look of both the pitch and the stands."
Link: https://t.co/hAmTQJHYXM
From what I've read, you "rank up" your stadium in FUT as you get better, so when you're playing against a good player, they'll have earnt a bigger stadium than yours. You don't buy the stadium "card" you want (or get it in a pack) any more.
I'll always hate FUT but honestly, I think that's a pretty cool idea.
This drives me crazy everytime.I love the "just go play the real thing" answer.
That's just the AI "competitor mode" option they've mentioned previously. Turn it on and the AI are harder to play against, and (worryingly) "more like an online competitor"... The AI is ping-pong and unrealistic enough as it is (even if it's still too easy).Adaptive AI
Funnily enough, Fortnite was in my reply to the guy:This drives me crazy everytime.
Everyone playing Assetto Corsa has a GT3 car in his garage and often takes it to the track, am I right? Every SimCity player has been (or currently is) a mayor, isn't this true?
I wish I could suggest them to go play Fortnite's "real thing" (a.k.a. to go get shot) but they wouldn't understand.
...which is a thing that we can now do while selecting the "live form" IIRC (the last time I played the options were "live form off", "live form on", "85 OVR for everyone" and I remember I was quite surprised to see it there beacause I didn't remember it from the previous time).And the "attributes" bit just lets you choose between standard player attributes and "make every player 85 OVR" (for a completely fair game).
Which is even worse if you ask me (as those Tottenham kits are fan-made so I'd expect kitmakers to take care of these issues when releasing a set by adding a non-clashing GK kit).My mistake. It must because I played so much PES 2020 and the option file I had Lloris wore his light blue kit!
Good shout, might be that. I was thinking that they may have moved stuff around (from the "live form" menu)....which is a thing that we can now do while selecting the "live form" IIRC (the last time I played the options were "live form off", "live form on", "85 OVR for everyone" and I remember I was quite surprised to see it there beacause I didn't remember it from the previous time).
Wasn't a thing like that also present in FIFA 17 though? I remember we had to choose between "balanced" or "real life" attributes for players.
I agree with all of your post.Which is even worse if you ask me (as those Tottenham kits are fan-made so I'd expect kitmakers to take care of these issues when releasing a set by adding a non-clashing GK kit).
Also, not remembering Tottenham's kits correctly may have been a small mistake of yours, but it's surely not your mistake when both FIFA and PES do this for several teams every year.
PES used to have away GK kits back in the day (the code and the "room" in the data files for them were there even in PES 2013 IIRC, even if by then home and away GK kits were already identical) and they worked quite well.
Scouser09 added support for them to FIFA 12-16 with Revolution Mod (and thanks to this in FIFA 16 kit clashing was avoided in a completely automatic fashion provided that the kitpacks had the correct lua assignments)... You could even decide to assign three or four GK kits to a team (the assignment for any outfield kit could be different aswell) and have the game choose the first one that didn't clash (following your order).
I can't see how hard can bringing it back into the game can be for either of the companies.
Yet another thing that has been brought away and that will probably return at a later date and be labeled as "ground-breaking new feature".
edit: and I’ve just noticed @Chris Davies post about making AI harder to play so it’s like a real life player. This is extremely interesting and all of a sudden I’m a tiny bit more interested in this than I initially was. But like you say, if it’s going to be ‘hard’ but ping pong passing back to front in 20 seconds I won’t enjoy that at all.
Stolen/borrowed/inspired by EASHL on NHL.From what I've read, you "rank up" your stadium in FUT as you get better, so when you're playing against a good player, they'll have earnt a bigger stadium than yours. You don't buy the stadium "card" you want (or get it in a pack) any more.
I'll always hate FUT but honestly, I think that's a pretty cool idea.
Not comparing here,but I've been constantly pissed off when Pes changed U.S. Palermo to just Palermo,or "something Calcio" to just "something"Silly little things annoy me way more than they should with both games but in FIFA 21 I’d love them to change things like Wolves being called Wolverhampton Wanderers, the ability to change shorts and socks colour (never going to happen because EA might not be allowed to give us that option), Spurs being called Tottenham Hotspur (I always play as them in FIFA and it annoys me that the league table says Spurs) and there are a million other things I won’t bore everyone with...
Similar to the kind of stuff 2K have been doing with their NBA games, and getting away with it too - and, combining it with aggressive microtransactions.Looks like EA may start including tv ads in sports games. UFC is the first one to get them.
"EA Sports, which publishes UFC 3, is on board with the tests. An Electronic Arts spokeswoman declined to comment".
https://www.wsj.com/articles/marketers-experiment-with-tv-ads-in-console-videogames-11595768400
(No indication that fifa 21 will have them, but who knows, maybe in due time. Depends on how their ufc test goes I guess.)
2K’s recent policies have been downright predatory. With versions of the game costing up to $100, NBA 2K20 encourages players to keep spending money as they play in ways only mobile games come close to matching. This year's entry is notable for having a casino in-game. Screen Rant's review of NBA 2K20 details the pay-to-win ecosystem and how the game feels like a perpetual grind that throws all sorts of gambling-related activities at the player, from card-packs to wheels to limited-time promotions.
"In exchange for watching the 15- or 30-second commercials—which is optional. Players don’t have to watch them—gamers receive points or other rewards they can use for in-game benefits."Looks like EA may start including tv ads in sports games. UFC is the first one to get them.
"EA Sports, which publishes UFC 3, is on board with the tests. An Electronic Arts spokeswoman declined to comment".
https://www.wsj.com/articles/marketers-experiment-with-tv-ads-in-console-videogames-11595768400
(No indication that fifa 21 will have them, but who knows, maybe in due time. Depends on how their ufc test goes I guess.)
With all due respect to the FIFA community (and not generalising) they've been given gameplay to TEST, and I don't see anyone (no influencers) commenting on any (gameplay) in the beta. Gameplay full of poor AI, players skating, weird ball physics and basically the same as FIFA 20, and yet I only see positive comments from these guys. "Add a new mechanic, we want new licenses, Firmino's face is new, lighting is better, etc..." What about gameplay? No? Is the most important thing for you guys the background? Seriously, I don't see one single criticism.
The thread below is pretty depressing. I have to translate each tweet (using Twitter's automated translation tool) but basically, "nobody in the beta test is critiquing the gameplay at all". Click the tweet below and then click it again when it loads up, and it should take you to the thread:
Main points are:
My concern is that he, or a contact of his, is basing this on either beta forum posts or on DMs involving testers (who, as he says, are largely streamers and/or influencers). They might not say things publicly but I'd wager they'll be talking privately.I think they aren't allowed to talk about the beta or they might risk getting banned? Not that I doubt the main points about the gameplay. That was pretty much what we saw in the leaked video.
That's just the AI "competitor mode" option they've mentioned previously. Turn it on and the AI are harder to play against, and (worryingly) "more like an online competitor"... The AI is ping-pong and unrealistic enough as it is (even if it's still too easy).
And the "attributes" bit just lets you choose between standard player attributes and "make every player 85 OVR" (for a completely fair game).
Funnily enough, Fortnite was in my reply to the guy:
My concern is that he, or a contact of his, is basing this on either beta forum posts or on DMs involving testers (who, as he says, are largely streamers and/or influencers). They might not say things publicly but I'd wager they'll be talking privately.