You're being biased. Both should complain about the ref. He might've dived to get the penalty but that's irrelevant because he was clearly obstructed. It doesn't matter whether it's soft or not. Obstruction, in the box; penalty. There was another dangerous tackle on Kante I think on the counter where he was sent flying but the play continued and Leicester scored. That should've been a red imo.
I'm puzzled too! Can't believe he deems that bizarre and rather mis-timed dive to be a penalty. I mean, if you watch Premier League week in week out, it's ludicrous!
The thing in the buildup to Leicester's penalty was a blunder by Koscielny. If you look at a replay, he was trying to clear the danger with a diving header? But he was so off the mark that he took out Kanté instead, who tripped over his trailing body. Koscielny did get booked for that.
But in no way you can say that was a straight red, or even claim that he deliberately fouled Kanté. I've never seen anyone trying to take somebody's legs out with their head?
Anyway Lami, I think you're asking too much of a referee who let this one slide without so much as a verbal warning:
)
on the return leg.
