Gunslinger
Premier League
- 5 September 2016
I remember all the World Cup Finals back to 1978. In my opinion, this is the best one in my lifetime.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature currently requires accessing the site using the built-in Safari browser.
Best World Cup I can remember. Croatia put up one hell of a fight, France were pragmatic but when you have the quality they do at the top of the pitch you will score plenty of goals.
One thing is for sure, France are going out of the 2022 World Cup at the group stages.
I though Beckenbauer was a defender.
Slaughter house the final was. As i feared. FRA-BEL was the real one.
It's a game changer but IMO Perisic's gesture seems intentional and not at all natural.
He lowers his hand and moves it to the ball.It's a clear penalty.If the hand wasn't moving towards the ball and the ball just hit the hand unintentionally then it wouldn't be.I think so too. Can understand the frustration though, if it takes the referee 1,000 views (and one extra at the very end) then he can't be completely sure and probably shouldn't give it.
The rules over handball seem so vague and subjective though, don't think I'll ever fully understand what constitutes handball under this system.
I think so too. Can understand the frustration though, if it takes the referee 1,000 views (and one extra at the very end) then he can't be completely sure and probably shouldn't give it.
The rules over handball seem so vague and subjective though, don't think I'll ever fully understand what constitutes handball under this system.
You're right, but the handball rule doesn't take into account the likelihood of a goal, does it? Only if it's intentional or not.Perisic hand prevents the ball continues its race in front of the Croatian goal
You're right, but the handball rule doesn't take into account the likelihood of a goal, does it? Only if it's intentional or not.
I've seen lots of people saying "if his hand wasn't there it would have been a goal" - but that's not the point. If he wasn't doing it on purpose, it's not a penalty. That's what the rules say.
There's just no way, in a World Cup final, when you're still in the game, with cameras all around you, with VAR ready, that you'd purposefully stick out your hand and smack a ball to prevent a goal. In some circumstances, it's a red card. Nobody is that stupid.
It was point-blank range, there's no way in this WORLD it was intentional, IMO.
And when VAR got involved, where a decision can only be changed if it's a "clear and obvious" mistake... How could it be, when the referee had to look at the replays, walk away and then GO BACK AGAIN to make up his mind? That's two rules ignored by the referee to give that penalty.
I feel really bad for Croatia - the free kick France scored from wasn't a free kick, and the penalty wasn't a penalty. (This is coming from a guy who wanted Croatia to lose after they beat England convincingly...)
All that being said, France were the better team and deserved to win - I just wish that, for what's been a fantastic World Cup, the final hadn't been so... Dodgy.
...congratulations TG!!!
In all seriousness, the rules need to change. I'm in favour of VAR but in its current interpretation, referees are completely ignoring the rules around its usage, and then it gets torn to pieces by the press.
On British TV our pundits are asking if handball should be changed so that, if the ball hits someone's hand, it's always a penalty - then you're not, as a referee, having to guess whether it was on purpose or not (because that's all it is, a guess). That'd be an interesting trial.
You're right, but the handball rule doesn't take into account the likelihood of a goal, does it? Only if it's intentional or not.
I've seen lots of people saying "if his hand wasn't there it would have been a goal" - but that's not the point. If he wasn't doing it on purpose, it's not a penalty. That's what the rules say.
There's just no way, in a World Cup final, when you're still in the game, with cameras all around you, with VAR ready, that you'd purposefully stick out your hand and smack a ball to prevent a goal. In some circumstances, it's a red card. Nobody is that stupid.
It was point-blank range, there's no way in this WORLD it was intentional, IMO.
And when VAR got involved, where a decision can only be changed if it's a "clear and obvious" mistake... How could it be, when the referee had to look at the replays, walk away and then GO BACK AGAIN to make up his mind? That's two rules ignored by the referee to give that penalty.
I feel really bad for Croatia - the free kick France scored from wasn't a free kick, and the penalty wasn't a penalty. (This is coming from a guy who wanted Croatia to lose after they beat England convincingly...)
All that being said, France were the better team and deserved to win - I just wish that, for what's been a fantastic World Cup, the final hadn't been so... Dodgy.
...congratulations TG!!!
In all seriousness, the rules need to change. I'm in favour of VAR but in its current interpretation, referees are completely ignoring the rules around its usage, and then it gets torn to pieces by the press.
On British TV our pundits are asking if handball should be changed so that, if the ball hits someone's hand, it's always a penalty - then you're not, as a referee, having to guess whether it was on purpose or not (because that's all it is, a guess). That'd be an interesting trial.
My Eleven of the WC18 (4-2-3-1)
------------------------Courtois-------------------------
Trippier---------Varane--------Mina--------Hernandez
------------------Modric(cap)--Kanté------------------
-------------------------Hazard-------------------------
------Mbappé-------------------------------Perisic-----
--------------------------Kane--------------------------
Coach : D.Deschamps