Official Transfers Only

Status
Not open for further replies.
Luis Suarez to Liverpool has finally been confirmed. £23m

The Uruguayan will wear the no.7 shirt.
 
Carroll for 36m is a joke tbh. The price of english players is whats killing our national side.

Because there soo expensive, teams like arsenal, chelsea and even united dont bother looking at local talen and just grab teh cheapest nasri/nani they can find for peanuts who ***** all over MOST english players.

Chammack for instance i would say from a none bias opinion that he is slightly better then andy carrol yet we got him for free! even if we had to buy him, he was only priced at 12m i think it was!

Look at vdv from spurs. bargain and again ***** all over many english players. how the **** can english players prosper in top english sides when a player like darren bent and ****ing andy cole costs over 30m??? a ****ing joke.
 
Looks like Torres tranfer (to Chelsea) is now official

Fernando-Torres.jpg

Source: http://www.liverpoolfc.tv/
TORRES DEAL AGREED

Liverpool Football Club tonight confirmed they have agreed a fee with Chelsea for the sale of Fernando Torres.

The player has now been given permission to speak to the London club.
 
Last edited:
Tamás Hajnal (Dortmund) -> VFB Stuttgart (Loan)
hajnalstuttgart_1.jpg

Krisztián Németh (Olympiacos Piraeus) -> Olymipiacos Volos (Loan)
And the Andy Carroll deal is almost official for Liverpool. But why? Is he really that good? Is he worth 35 million pounds?
 
Last edited:
Oba Oba Martins (Rubin Kazan) > Birmingham (loan with buy option)
http://www.bcfc.com/page/News/NewsDetail/0,,10412~2279243,00.html
André (Dinamo Kiev) > Bordeaux (loan)
andre_bordeaux_afp_60.jpg
Stephen Ireland (Aston Villa) > Newcastle United (loan until the end of the season)
http://www.nufc.co.uk/articles/20110131/ireland-completes-loan-move_2281670_2281346
Andy Reid (Sunderland) > Blackpool
http://news.bbc.co.uk/sport2/hi/football/teams/b/blackpool/9382499.stm
C. Stewart (Man Utd) > Hull City
http://www.hullcityafc.net/page/NewsDetail/0,,10338~2280924,00.html
Charisteas > Arles > Free > Shalke 04
http://www.schalke04.com/news/single-view/artikel/charisteas-signed-to-end-of-season.html
Sturridge (Chelsea) > Bolton (loan)
http://www.chelseafc.com/page/LatestNews/0,,10268~2281398,00.html

Matri (Cagliari) > Juventus
Amauri (Juventus) > Parma (loan)
Obi (Inter) > Parma (full ownership now)
http://www.facebook.com/pages/Fc-Parma/128774457161347
http://www.cagliaricalcio.net/news/notizia.asp?idNotizia=10008&type=0&id_menu=1
 
Last edited:
New list. CRAZY!!

1 Cristiano Ronaldo Manchester United -> Real Madrid £80 2009
2 Zlatan Ibrahimović Internazionale -> Barcelona £56.5 2009
3 Kaká Milan -> Real Madrid £56 2009
4 Fernando Torres Liverpool -> Chelsea £50 2011
5 Zinedine Zidane Juventus -> Real Madrid £45 2001
6 Luís Figo Barcelona -> Real Madrid £37 2000
7 Hernán Crespo Parma -> Lazio £35.5 2000
8 Andy Carroll Newcastle United -> Liverpool £35 2011
9 David Villa Valencia -> Barcelona £34.2 2010
10 Gianluigi Buffon Parma -> Juventus £32.6 2001
 
Last edited:
Oh, man, seeing Andy Carroll there.. :COAT:

Andy Carroll transfer = joke of the year

WHY are you people looking just on the prize and coplaining... he was emergency transfer for LFC and yet maybe he proves all who doubt wrong..

The prizes of footballers are going rapidly high...he is not better than Nedved for example...but most of those record breaking transfers are old now, in this times their prize would be tripple so Carrol would not be there at 8 place..

Besides LFC net spending this winter is probably 1 - 2 mil. pounds...they basicly replaced Torres who dont wanted to stay + Babel for Suarez and Carroll... That are just numbers for the club..

Chelsea lost 70+ milion pounds, nobody complains, Newcastle are 35 mil. pounds richer but LFC net spend is 2 mil. pounds, with few hours to end the window who else should they buy? i think this might be even good for the club becouse this players are hungry and young..

LFC have new owners, and god knows how much money they have...its better to have for once the money we get for a sell spended to a new buy, with previous owners we would buy Carlton Cole now instead of maybe future England n.9 striker at young age for 5.5 years...
 
well pipa I would reply you with a logical post but I'm not gonna do that atm. just one sentence to say;

what would your reaction be if it would have been Real Madrid instead of Liverpool? I can imagine that. :)
 
I dont know exactly the point in your question.. And also i dont know where Real Madrid take their money from for the players, but reasonalby for LFC is not like they are spending giants.. this just happend to be..

look, LFC just bought what they sell..

Torres - 50 mil.
Babel - 6 mil.

Suarez - 23 mil.
Carroll - 35 mil.

that is net spend 2 mil. just from the new owners, they basicly spend nothing yet + we as club have a new sponsor in standard chartered who also provided money for the club... nothing spend yet...

I think for LFC this is not as if they overpriced someone, in normal circumstances this would not happend, as nobody thought to see Torres want to leave so close to end of transfer period...
 
Yes but when you see that top ten, you see all world class players and then 20th best forward in the English premier league, a completly unproven player with attittude problems.

His prize is ridiculous...
 
You have a point mate but a huge chance presented itself with the Torres sale to reinvest in all positions lacking and rebuild the squad and you really need some defenders and midfielders, even I heard Reina might leave.

Look at what Inter did with the Ibra money(Milito,Eto'o,Motta,Lucio,Sneijder,Pandev and won the treble). Liverpool just rushed into things and could have done much better in the summer. It not like a CL spot is a guarentee this season and I hear Carroll is injured for a month.

I don't know about the owners splashing money anymore. UEFA had some hard words on Chelsea today. These type of transfers are not doing football any good.
 
Last edited:
this type of transfers might end in summer, comparing to how other english clubs are spending, LFC did nothing wrong, they in first place needed to replace Torres, something tells me this whole transfer thing was going on in background for longer than this 3 days.. and Carroll was Kennys radar longer before he was appointed.. i trust him to take best out of him..

if we didn´t buy him Newcastle would not have him for long time anyway, and he would be bought from United... btw, they spended 30 mil. on Berbatov, i know he is proven striker but he also looked like bad buy his first season..

it´s all about team work...if the team will click and start winning, then Carroll money will be forgotten.. and as Kenny said, for the club it´s important to have players that wan´t to play there.. No better option was avileable and they needed to replace Torres..

Carroll is only 22, he basicly is young player, younger than Torres 4 years, younger even then Rooney a year or two.. not many strikers had the goalscoring ability and physique like him in their 22 years..

it´s a risk, but it might pay off...in future.
 
Look at what Inter did with the Ibra money(Milito,Eto'o,Motta,Lucio,Sneijder,Pandev and won the treble). Liverpool just rushed into things and could have done much better in the summer. It not like a CL spot is a guarentee this season and I hear Carroll is injured for a month.
I think this says it all really. Imagine if Inter had only bought, let's say, Cavani, they'd never accomplish what they did.
 
Well maybe Liverpool should have opted for a transition period and bought another (much cheaper) forward or should not have bought a striker at all.

To me this is a huge gamble, too big to be good management.

But what Chelsea did was even worse for football (and i can assure you that i have much sympathy for both clubs). They announced that their annual loss was 83 million Euro's and in one day they bought two players that costed them exactly the same amount as their annual loss...this is pure madness.

I don't want to blame Chelsea for this, but UEFA really should intervene. Last week i just read a report that in England and Spain 90% of the clubs (and ALL the big clubs) are financially in a very bad state. Clubs in litle countries like Belgium (but in Belgium alone) are dwarfs but are financially healthy. This is unfair competition.
 
Well maybe Liverpool should have opted for a transition period and bought another (much cheaper) forward or should not have bought a striker at all.

To me this is a huge gamble, too big to be good management.

But what Chelsea did was even worse for football (and i can assure you that i have much sympathy for both clubs). They announced that their annual loss was 83 million Euro's and in one day they bought two players that costed them exactly the same amount as their annual loss...this is pure madness.

I don't want to blame Chelsea for this, but UEFA really should intervene. Last week i just read a report that in England and Spain 90% of the clubs (and ALL the big clubs) are financially in a very bad state. Clubs in litle countries like Belgium (but in Belgium alone) are dwarfs but are financially healthy. This is unfair competition.

It'll be interesting to see what the new 'financial fair play' model will mean for all those big spenders when it's finally fully integrated by the UEFA. I fear, though: nothing at all.
 
this type of transfers might end in summer, comparing to how other english clubs are spending, LFC did nothing wrong, they in first place needed to replace Torres, something tells me this whole transfer thing was going on in background for longer than this 3 days.. and Carroll was Kennys radar longer before he was appointed.. i trust him to take best out of him..

You are right about this, Torres could left the club in summer but he didn't want to because as you know Liverpool was looking for new owners, and that wasn't profitable for Liverpool that's one of the reason..

And the offer by Chelsea was from 10 days ago, but the club asked to Torres to don't say anything untill Luiz Suarez sign with them (Liverpool)
 
Last edited:
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top Bottom