New Kits

mt630005hrd_nb_40_i

mt630005hrd_nb_41_i

mt630005hrd_nb_34_i

mt630005hrd_nb_35_i

mt630005hrd_nb_37_i




az%2Balkmaar%2B16-17%2Baway%2Bkit%2B%25282%2529.jpg

az%2Balkmaar%2B16-17%2Baway%2Bkit%2B%25283%2529.jpg

az%2Balkmaar%2B16-17%2Baway%2Bkit%2B%25281%2529.jpg






bologna-16-17-home-kit%2B%25281%2529.jpg
bologna-16-17-home-kit%2B%25282%2529.jpg

bologna-16-17-home-kit%2B%25283%2529.jpg
 
Terrible pattern. Without it the kit would be so much better. And I don't get why Adidas doesn't treat ManU as a premium club giving them the normal template with the stripes on the shoulders instead of the sides.
 
very nice celtic, hamburg, leicester and bologna kits!


P.S. ac milan new logo is just awful!
 
Last edited:
Nice, although without the buttons it would have been nicer. I don't like buttons on sports shirts, they're not business dresses.

Edit: Official WBA home kit pictures:

west-bromwich-albion-16-17-home-kit%2B%25282%2529.jpg
west-bromwich-albion-16-17-home-kit%2B%25283%2529.jpg
 
Last edited:
I hope for Umbro but if Chelsea decided to pay out Adidas to end the agreement early (and you can imagine how many millions in euro this move costed to the club) that means the new sportswear brand has the power to pay more than Adidas (fine included)...few brands can afford this...
 
Real Madrid Adizero


16RMHALK8.jpg
16RMHALK9.jpg







amineken22 said:
There was no fine, they just payed compensation (basically returned the money back) and cancelled the contract. Nothing more.

And yeah, there are talks about a new (or at least relative new to football) sports brand coming with a huge offer atm. Underarmour is getting a mention which would be great too.
Click to expand...





Contracts doesn't work that way.

All sport brands put clauses obligating teams to pay a huge fine if they broke the contract unilaterally.
 
Last edited:
amineken22 said:
And yeah, there are talks about a new (or at least relative new to football) sports brand coming with a huge offer atm. Underarmour is getting a mention which would be great too.
Click to expand...


Dryworld? Not liking their kits, but Warrior/NB were also strange at the beginning and they are at least getting better year by year.
 
amineken22 said:
I don't think you understand how contracts work. It was a mutual termination: there was no breach and thus no fine.
Click to expand...

Even mutual terminations can result in fines when respective clauses were included. And in this case Chelsea paid a "mid-double digit million" amount to Adidas for terminating the contract earlier according to Footyheadlines.

Mainz "new" kit (only new collar, rest remains the same:
mainz-16-17-kit%2B%25284%2529.jpg
mainz-16-17-kit%2B%25285%2529.jpg


Hull Wolverhampton new kit with its terrible sponsor:
wolves-16-17-kit%2B%25283%2529.jpg
 
very nice everton and chelsea third (white), wolverhampton is also good but ruined with awful sponsor.
 
Last edited:
Watford? :THINK:

Blackburn and Umbro signed a five-year deal:

blackburn-umbro-deal.jpg


And the new St. Etienne kits (home, away, third in that order). Although many will like them, I preferred the Adidas kits, they were not so plain and boring:
as-saint-etienne-16-17-kits%2B%25282%2529.jpg
as-saint-etienne-16-17-kits%2B%25283%2529.jpg
as-saint-etienne-16-17-kits%2B%25284%2529.jpg
 
St Etienne didn't change at all from the previous kits,just added the polo collar... Yeah their adidas kits were much better.

United looks as boring as their football,so it suits them lol
 
The Le Coq Sportif kits are much better in my opinion. Really fits in much better with the club identity and the adidas kits were generic as well. As for the new kits, they look great again. The cuffs are different too. Normally I'd say brands are lazy for not changing the kit, but if it's not broken, why fix it?
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top Bottom