• Update: The issue surrounding 2FA logins using the Google Authenticator should be resolved now. Sorry for any inconvenience this has caused. /Tom
  • We've been getting a growing number of reports from users being unable to log into their accounts using Two-Factor Authentication (2FA) with the Google Authenticator, putting them into an error loop. Rest assured we're trying to fix this asap. Thanks for your patience! /Tom

New Kits

144316463.jpg

144309585.jpg

144312476.jpg

144312475.jpg


It looks claret-blue to me.It also is descripted so in the club shop.
 
The Man Utd kits will probably look okay out on the pitch since the pattern won't be as obvious. Generally speaking though this looks like a bad year for kits overall.
 
Blue GK kit and striped third(?) are awful. Blue player kit away(?) and yellow GK kit are ok. The zebra pattern on the back of the blue player kit looks ridiculous though.
 
If those designs are set to be the real deal, then Spurs have made a blunder with the silver and black third kit. Why? Because all three kits would clash with Newcastle and West Brom, and to a lesser extent, Wigan (who will wear stripes next season).

Also the Man U goalie jersey looks like its been attacked with a lawnmower! :D
 
What's going on with the EPL teams?
Why do they switch from good quality companies to the crappy ones?
Liverpool (from adidas to warrior) - wtf is warrior, have never heard of them!
Tottenham (from puma to under armour) - again wtf. UA provides stuff for american football.
Aston Villa (from nike to macron) - another wtf.

Nike, adidas and puma are making good kits and are proved to be the leaders in the kit market. So do these clubs really believe that warrior, under armour and macron are better?
 
Without knowing any figures etc. Im pretty sure it is just to do with those companies offering better deals and paying more money. I can image that teams like Aston Villa for example arent top priority for Nike when they have United, Barcelona, Juventus etc. in their portfolio. These smaller companies are probably spending a much higher share of their budgets to these teams in order to get their name out and a foothold in new markets. Again, this is without knowing any of the figures and pure speculations, but I am pretty confident that that is the underlying reason.
 
VK said:
What's going on with the EPL teams?
Why do they switch from good quality companies to the crappy ones?
Liverpool (from adidas to warrior) - wtf is warrior, have never heard of them!
Tottenham (from puma to under armour) - again wtf. UA provides stuff for american football.
Aston Villa (from nike to macron) - another wtf.

Nike, adidas and puma are making good kits and are proved to be the leaders in the kit market. So do these clubs really believe that warrior, under armour and macron are better?
Click to expand...

Money, money and more money.
 
They are companies and they have to earn some money. So what is wrong in choosing the deal that gives you the most money? No one, even not these brave and moral clean angels here would negate such an offering.
 
Arsenal would be nice if the purple was more leaning towards blue.
Where has the PSG stripe gone?In Barca?
 
My opinion on the blue kit hasn't changed, the grey on the home kit doesn't look good either to be honest.

I hope its not official.
 
The home kit,lose the grey and it's the same as the current one.
The blue kit is kinda cheap looking
The 3rd well... Garish is the only word I can think of.
 
The grey on the home kit drawing is possibly a mesh pattern. But like I said a few posts ago, the third kit is completely useless and wouldn't solve any issues with colour clashes when Spurs play at Newcastle or West Brom.

Fourth kit anyone?
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top Bottom