vanzandt
The answer must be Jam
- 26 July 2007
- Everton
Do you think that when Mclaren was a kid, do you think he had that toy where the correct shape needed to be pushed into the right hole.....and just broke it by trying to tw@ the square into the round hole and the star into the square hole etc.
Just watched a retarded coaching display yet again from the ginger nut (nut for nutter not for head).
He plays Kieron Dyer as a striker or split striker....why?
Can anyone seriously say that he is a better option up front than Defoe? Ok Defoe isn't getting game...then again is Crouch? No, so why not play Defoe and not Dyer?
Or what about a player like Doyle or Lita?
No doubt in my mind at all that either would be more likely to hit the net than Dyer.
If your going to play Dyer presumably it would make sense to at least play him in midfield?
So we have midfielder Dyer as a split striker, unplayed Crouch up front. We remove our best attacking threat in the first half- Mica Richards and play him at centre back- presumably because he was too effective in the first half damaging the Germans and setting up a goal. We take off Carrick and bring on Gareth Barry as a holding midfielder....has he ever played there for Villa...like ever?
We bring Brown on at right back when he could play at centre- and left Mica at right back....the swich means that brown (crap at going forward) just sits and we have no increased attacking threat.....even with 84 minutes on the clock he doesn't swich them back so Mica can go down the right....why? I mean what are we risking at that stage?
Barry who preumably can be decent at left back or left mid is played in a holding role....why, what is the point given he will never play there long term?
We bring on Wright Phillips who could play as a split striker- even though he isn't perfetc for that role...but no we don't do that we keep Dyer there, do we play him on the right and remove the tiring Beckham....no ww keep an ineffective Beckham on and remove one of our main threats in Cole and put Phillips out of position on the left..
At the end we could have took off Beckham, moved Dyer to the right, kept Cole on and played Phillips off of Crouch or played Cole off of Crouch, put Dyer in for Beckham- played Barry on the left and brough on a proper holding midfielder....
Mclown the man who has no idea whatsoever about the need to retain shape and formation, the man who knowns everything about smashing round pegs into square holes....total idiot.
The positives on the night have nothing to do with Mclown at all.
They were to my mind;
Shorey was brillaint down the left and hardly anyone mentioned it.
Mica Richards was a revelation at full-back
Frank Lampard put in a very good performace for once
Before Carrick was taken off England had balance with him and Lampard..
From what we saw from that England need to play Gerard or Lampard with either Carrick or Hargreaves and stop the obsession of playing Gerard and Lampard together.....Mclown will probably ignore that though
Just watched a retarded coaching display yet again from the ginger nut (nut for nutter not for head).
He plays Kieron Dyer as a striker or split striker....why?
Can anyone seriously say that he is a better option up front than Defoe? Ok Defoe isn't getting game...then again is Crouch? No, so why not play Defoe and not Dyer?
Or what about a player like Doyle or Lita?
No doubt in my mind at all that either would be more likely to hit the net than Dyer.
If your going to play Dyer presumably it would make sense to at least play him in midfield?
So we have midfielder Dyer as a split striker, unplayed Crouch up front. We remove our best attacking threat in the first half- Mica Richards and play him at centre back- presumably because he was too effective in the first half damaging the Germans and setting up a goal. We take off Carrick and bring on Gareth Barry as a holding midfielder....has he ever played there for Villa...like ever?
We bring Brown on at right back when he could play at centre- and left Mica at right back....the swich means that brown (crap at going forward) just sits and we have no increased attacking threat.....even with 84 minutes on the clock he doesn't swich them back so Mica can go down the right....why? I mean what are we risking at that stage?
Barry who preumably can be decent at left back or left mid is played in a holding role....why, what is the point given he will never play there long term?
We bring on Wright Phillips who could play as a split striker- even though he isn't perfetc for that role...but no we don't do that we keep Dyer there, do we play him on the right and remove the tiring Beckham....no ww keep an ineffective Beckham on and remove one of our main threats in Cole and put Phillips out of position on the left..
At the end we could have took off Beckham, moved Dyer to the right, kept Cole on and played Phillips off of Crouch or played Cole off of Crouch, put Dyer in for Beckham- played Barry on the left and brough on a proper holding midfielder....
Mclown the man who has no idea whatsoever about the need to retain shape and formation, the man who knowns everything about smashing round pegs into square holes....total idiot.
The positives on the night have nothing to do with Mclown at all.
They were to my mind;
Shorey was brillaint down the left and hardly anyone mentioned it.
Mica Richards was a revelation at full-back
Frank Lampard put in a very good performace for once
Before Carrick was taken off England had balance with him and Lampard..
From what we saw from that England need to play Gerard or Lampard with either Carrick or Hargreaves and stop the obsession of playing Gerard and Lampard together.....Mclown will probably ignore that though
Last edited: