Had a blast on this today... It really is awful.
I'm glad I've spent £3 on it because it's obvious they need the money to get some better programmers in. The match engine is a disgrace. Twice I had a defender get the ball, run in a 30-yard circle (taking about 15 seconds), then pass it straight to the opposition striker with no possible teammate he could have been passing to anywhere near him. Oh, goal! What a surprise. FM has its moments but nothing like this.
I've done a quarter of a season in about half an hour, on FM it takes me half an hour to do two or three games because of the amount of detail you have to go through. You can see the difference all your tactical tinkering is making - in this it does nothing as far as I'm concerned, it's like an Amiga management game, horribly shallow on the field and just as bad off it.
Truly woeful, with terrible data as well (Tranmere have a player missing - he's not even in the game - and the backroom staff have the stats of Sunday League staff). You can tell some of the stats are just guessed because there's a few staff who are known for being good tactically, and a few who are good with the youth team - and their stats are the total opposite way around to what they should be.
Utter garbage compared to Football Manager, which is a bastard because the animations in the match engine are so sexy at times. Total waste of whoever put them together's time.
To top it off, FourFourTwo have given it 5/5. A magazine sponsored by Championship Manager. WOW I DIDN'T EXPECT THAT - this should be banned.
(By banned, I mean the practice of giving the game you're sponsored by 5/5.
And the game itself.)