jonneymendoza
Legend
- 1 January 2004
- Arsenal
Re: Call of Duty 7 : Black Ops
i thought halo is the number one fps game on xbox? anyways i prefer even rainbow six vegas games compared to the run and gun COD games.
fair enough you and others like it. im just stating my reasons why i dont. its the same old game. nothing has changed.
here is my post from a different forum.
It was in response to someone say "how is £40 a waste on a game you play for 100+hours"
From my post above you get a general idea on why got bored of COD after WAW. it doesnt HAVE to be like BC2. but for me it HAS to be true sequal to previous COD games offering something different and refreshing. WAW was the last game that offered that with zombie mode and coop in the main campaign. what has COD done since then? fuck all
Jonney BC is a completely different type of game and always has been. It's clear they have a 10x more open gameplay with those gigantic maps and all sorts of different things you can be from being a Medic to a riflemen. Point is the two games are different, I personally prefer COD but I've also played BF starting from BC1. Call of Duty is a game of its own and the multiplayer is simply fantastic where the maps aren't as big as BF and you can choose to play the game the way you want to.
Call me what you want but I bought Call of Duty: World at War and MW2 and both games have been great. Like all games it had its flaws but I really enjoyed both campaigns and both provided a very good multiplayer experience.
Why would they revamp the gameplay from COD4 when everyone loved it? Isn't that the COD where everyone began to fall in love with the series? COD4 brought the best FPS online experience to xbox (in my view of course) and Treyarch and Activision have built upon it which clearly has worked.
i thought halo is the number one fps game on xbox? anyways i prefer even rainbow six vegas games compared to the run and gun COD games.
fair enough you and others like it. im just stating my reasons why i dont. its the same old game. nothing has changed.
here is my post from a different forum.
for me here is my run down of cod games:
COD4 - 20-30hours of game time as it was a breath of fresh air compared to COD3 and a worthy sequal
COD WAW - 10-20Hours purely on zombie mode and coop campaign that me and my bro done and completed a few times over as it was mad fun
COD MW2 - 10-20mins of game time. utter crap, same old COD4 game and a step back from WAW with no ****ing coop(glad i diddnt buy this game and tried the "demo" first, uninstalled it straight away plus no dedi servers and p2p online gaming :suicide::rotfl
COD black ops - not even going to bother trying out the "demo" :thumbsdow no coop, no innovative features not done in past cod games. same 10 year old game engine and same 20 year old tetris style gun sounds :rolleyes:
COD WAW and COD4 are the only worthy games that were worth £30. the rest not even worth trying out the "demo" let alone coughing up £40:rolleyes::facepalm:
It was in response to someone say "how is £40 a waste on a game you play for 100+hours"
From my post above you get a general idea on why got bored of COD after WAW. it doesnt HAVE to be like BC2. but for me it HAS to be true sequal to previous COD games offering something different and refreshing. WAW was the last game that offered that with zombie mode and coop in the main campaign. what has COD done since then? fuck all
Last edited: